Hamm v. City of Rock Hill
379 U.S. 306 · Decided December 14, 1964 · Supreme Court of the United States
Record summary. This page is generated from the Supreme Court Database’s coded data about the case. It describes who decided what, not the Court’s reasoning. Read the opinion itself before relying on it. Not legal advice.
At a glance
Hamm v. City of Rock Hill was decided on December 14, 1964 by a vote of 5–4. The Court vacated the lower court's decision. Justice Tom C. Clark wrote the opinion of the Court. SCDB classifies its main issue as “Sit-in demonstrations against racial discrimination” in the Civil Rights area.
Read the opinion
Case details
- Citations
- 379 U.S. 306 · 85 S. Ct. 384 · 13 L. Ed. 2d 300 · 1964 U.S. LEXIS 4
- Docket number
- 2
- Decided
- December 14, 1964
- Argued
- October 12, 1964
- Court era
- Warren Court
- Decision type
- Opinion of the Court (orally argued)
- Disposition
- Vacated
- Outcome for petitioner
- The petitioning party received a favorable disposition
- Vote
- 5–4
- Majority opinion
- Tom C. Clark
- Opinion assigned by
- Earl Warren
- How the case arrived
- Certiorari
- Issue area
- Civil Rights
- Legal provision
- Civil Rights Act of 1964 (Title II)
- Type of law
- Federal statute
- Decision direction (SCDB)
- Liberal what this means
How the Justices voted
| Justice | Vote | Separate writing |
|---|---|---|
| Justice Hugo L. Black | Dissent | Wrote an opinion |
| Justice William O. Douglas | Concurrence | Wrote an opinion |
| Justice Tom C. Clark | Majority | Wrote an opinion |
| Chief Justice Earl Warren | Majority | |
| Justice John M. Harlan II | Dissent | Wrote an opinion |
| Justice William J. Brennan Jr. | Majority | |
| Justice Potter Stewart | Dissent | Wrote an opinion |
| Justice Byron R. White | Dissent | Wrote an opinion |
| Justice Arthur J. Goldberg | Concurrence |
Full case caption
Hamm v. City of Rock Hill
SCDB identifiers: case 1964-019, docket 1964-019-01.
Related decisions
Other cases on “Sit-in demonstrations against racial discrimination”
- Blow v. North Carolina
- Abernathy v. Alabama.
- McKinnie v. Tennessee
- Parrot v. City of Tallahassee
- Walker v. Georgia
- Drews v. Maryland
Cases on the same legal provision: Civil Rights Act of 1964 (Title II)
- Heart of Atlanta Motel, Inc. v. United States
- Katzenbach v. McClung
- Newman v. Piggie Park Enterprises, Inc.
- United States v. Johnson
- Daniel v. Paul
Same Term, same area (Civil Rights)
- Scranton v. Drew
- McLaughlin v. FloridaAltered precedentLaw held unconstitutional
- Heart of Atlanta Motel, Inc. v. United States
- Katzenbach v. McClung
- Parsons v. Buckley
- Fortson v. Dorsey
Source: Supreme Court Database, 2026 Release 01 (data file dated September 8, 2026). Imported into CaseTrail November 5, 2026. Coverage: decisions from the 1946 through 2025 Terms. Methodology · Report an error