Boston & Maine Railroad v. United States
358 U.S. 68 · Decided November 17, 1958 · Supreme Court of the United States
Record summary. This page is generated from the Supreme Court Database’s coded data about the case. It describes who decided what, not the Court’s reasoning. Read the opinion itself before relying on it. Not legal advice.
At a glance
Boston & Maine Railroad v. United States was decided on November 17, 1958 unanimously (9–0). SCDB codes the disposition as “petition denied or appeal dismissed.” The decision was issued per curiam (an unsigned opinion of the Court). SCDB classifies its main issue as “Railroad regulation” in the Economic Activity area.
Read the opinion
Case details
- Citations
- 358 U.S. 68 · 79 S. Ct. 107 · 3 L. Ed. 2d 34 · 1958 U.S. LEXIS 1779
- Docket number
- 310
- Decided
- November 17, 1958
- Court era
- Warren Court
- Decision type
- Per curiam (no oral argument)
- Disposition
- Petition denied or appeal dismissed
- Outcome for petitioner
- The petitioning party did not receive a favorable disposition
- Vote
- 9–0 (unanimous)
- Opinion assigned by
- Earl Warren
- How the case arrived
- Appeal
- Issue (SCDB)
- Railroad regulation
- Issue area
- Economic Activity
- Legal provision
- Administrative Procedure Act or Administrative Orders Review Act
- Type of law
- Federal statute
- Decision direction (SCDB)
- Liberal what this means
How the Justices voted
| Justice | Vote | Separate writing |
|---|---|---|
| Justice Hugo L. Black | Majority | |
| Justice Felix Frankfurter | Majority | |
| Justice William O. Douglas | Majority | |
| Justice Tom C. Clark | Majority | |
| Chief Justice Earl Warren | Majority | |
| Justice John M. Harlan II | Majority | |
| Justice William J. Brennan Jr. | Majority | |
| Justice Charles E. Whittaker | Majority | |
| Justice Potter Stewart | Majority |
Full case caption
Boston & Maine Railroad et al. v. United States et al.
SCDB identifiers: case 1958-006, docket 1958-006-01.
Related decisions
Other cases on “Railroad regulation”
- Alleghany Corporation v. Breswick & Co.
- Chicago v. Illinois
- United States v. Seaboard Air Line Railroad Co.
- Union Pacific Railroad Co. v. United States
- California v. Taylor
- Alleghany Corporation v. Breswick & Co.
Cases on the same legal provision: Administrative Procedure Act or Administrative Orders Review Act
- Shaughnessy v. Pedreiro
- Ramspeck v. Federal Trial Examiners Conference
- United States v. L. A. Tucker Truck Lines, Inc.
- Consolo v. Federal Maritime Commission
- Universal Camera Corp. v. National Labor Relations Board
- Wong Yang Sung v. McGrath
Same Term, same area (Economic Activity)
- Moore v. Terminal Railroad Association of St. Louis
- Sangamon Valley Television Corp. v. United States
- Wirl Television Corp. v. United States
- Deen v. Hickman
- Worz, Inc. v. Federal Communications Commission
- Federal Housing Administration v. the Darlington, Inc.
Source: Supreme Court Database, 2026 Release 01 (data file dated September 8, 2026). Imported into CaseTrail November 5, 2026. Coverage: decisions from the 1946 through 2025 Terms. Methodology · Report an error