Worz, Inc. v. Federal Communications Commission
358 U.S. 55 · Decided October 27, 1958 · Supreme Court of the United States
Record summary. This page is generated from the Supreme Court Database’s coded data about the case. It describes who decided what, not the Court’s reasoning. Read the opinion itself before relying on it. Not legal advice.
At a glance
Worz, Inc. v. Federal Communications Commission was decided on October 27, 1958 by a vote of 7–2. The Court vacated the lower court's decision and remanded the case. The decision was issued per curiam (an unsigned opinion of the Court). SCDB classifies its main issue as “Governmental corruption or regulation” in the Economic Activity area.
Read the opinion
Case details
- Citations
- 358 U.S. 55 · 79 S. Ct. 114 · 3 L. Ed. 2d 48 · 1958 U.S. LEXIS 1914
- Docket number
- 349
- Decided
- October 27, 1958
- Court era
- Warren Court
- Decision type
- Per curiam (no oral argument)
- Disposition
- Vacated and remanded
- Outcome for petitioner
- The petitioning party received a favorable disposition
- Vote
- 7–2
- Opinion assigned by
- Earl Warren
- How the case arrived
- Certiorari
- Issue (SCDB)
- Governmental corruption or regulation
- Issue area
- Economic Activity
- Decision direction (SCDB)
- Liberal what this means
How the Justices voted
| Justice | Vote | Separate writing |
|---|---|---|
| Justice Hugo L. Black | Majority | |
| Justice Felix Frankfurter | Majority | |
| Justice William O. Douglas | Majority | |
| Justice Tom C. Clark | Dissent | Co-authored an opinion |
| Chief Justice Earl Warren | Majority | |
| Justice John M. Harlan II | Dissent | Co-authored an opinion |
| Justice William J. Brennan Jr. | Majority | |
| Justice Charles E. Whittaker | Majority | |
| Justice Potter Stewart | Majority |
Full case caption
Worz, Inc., v. Federal Communications Commission et al.
SCDB identifiers: case 1958-009, docket 1958-009-01.
Related decisions
Other cases on “Governmental corruption or regulation”
- Sangamon Valley Television Corp. v. United States
- Wirl Television Corp. v. United States
- United States v. Shirey
- Barr v. Matteo
- Howard v. Lyons
- United States v. Mississippi Valley Generating Co.
Same Term, same area (Economic Activity)
- Moore v. Terminal Railroad Association of St. Louis
- Sangamon Valley Television Corp. v. United States
- Wirl Television Corp. v. United States
- Deen v. Hickman
- Boston & Maine Railroad v. United States
- Federal Housing Administration v. the Darlington, Inc.
Source: Supreme Court Database, 2026 Release 01 (data file dated September 8, 2026). Imported into CaseTrail November 5, 2026. Coverage: decisions from the 1946 through 2025 Terms. Methodology · Report an error