Califano v. Goldfarb
430 U.S. 199 · Decided March 2, 1977 · Supreme Court of the United States
At a glance
Califano v. Goldfarb was decided on March 2, 1977 by a vote of 5–4. The Court affirmed the lower court's decision. Justice William J. Brennan Jr. wrote the opinion announcing the judgment of the Court. SCDB classifies its main issue as “Sex discrimination (excluding employment)” in the Civil Rights area. SCDB records that the Court declared an act of Congress unconstitutional.
Read the opinion
Case details
- Citations
- 430 U.S. 199 · 97 S. Ct. 1021 · 51 L. Ed. 2d 270 · 1977 U.S. LEXIS 53
- Docket number
- 75-699
- Decided
- March 2, 1977
- Argued
- October 5, 1976
- Court era
- Burger Court
- Decision type
- Judgment of the Court (orally argued)
- Disposition
- Affirmed
- Outcome for petitioner
- The petitioning party did not receive a favorable disposition
- Vote
- 5–4
- Majority opinion
- William J. Brennan Jr.
- Opinion assigned by
- William J. Brennan Jr.
- How the case arrived
- Appeal
- Issue (SCDB)
- Sex discrimination (excluding employment)
- Issue area
- Civil Rights
- Legal provision
- Social Security Act
- Type of law
- Federal statute
- Held unconstitutional
- An act of Congress
- Decision direction (SCDB)
- Liberal what this means
How the Justices voted
| Justice | Vote | Separate writing |
|---|---|---|
| Justice William J. Brennan Jr. | Judgment of the Court | Wrote an opinion |
| Justice Potter Stewart | Dissent | |
| Justice Byron R. White | Majority | |
| Justice Thurgood Marshall | Majority | |
| Chief Justice Warren E. Burger | Dissent | |
| Justice Harry A. Blackmun | Dissent | |
| Justice Lewis F. Powell Jr. | Majority | |
| Justice William H. Rehnquist | Dissent | Wrote an opinion |
| Justice John Paul Stevens | Special concurrence | Wrote an opinion |
Full case caption
Califano, Secretary of Health, Education, and Welfare v. Goldfarb
SCDB identifiers: case 1976-061, docket 1976-061-01.
Related decisions
Other cases on “Sex discrimination (excluding employment)”
- Califano v. Webster
- Stanton v. Stanton
- Vorchheimer v. School District of Philadelphia
- Craig v. BorenAltered precedentLaw held unconstitutional
- Mathews v. de Castro
- Quilloin v. Walcott et Vir
Cases on the same legal provision: Social Security Act
- Califano v. Torres
- Califano v. Yamasaki
- New York State Department of Social Services v. Dublino
- Philpott v. Essex County Welfare BoardLaw held unconstitutional
- Richardson v. Wright
- Richardson v. Perales
Same Term, same area (Civil Rights)
- Immigration and Naturalization Service v. Bagamasbad
- General Electric Co. v. Gilbert
- Mathews v. de Castro
- Craig v. BorenAltered precedentLaw held unconstitutional
- International Union of Electrical v. Robbins & Myers, Inc.
- Village of Arlington Heights v. Metropolitan Housing Development Corp.
Source: Supreme Court Database, 2026 Release 01 (data file dated September 8, 2026). Imported into CaseTrail November 5, 2026. Coverage: decisions from the 1946 through 2025 Terms. Methodology · Report an error