Philpott v. Essex County Welfare Board
409 U.S. 413 · Decided January 10, 1973 · Supreme Court of the United States
At a glance
Philpott v. Essex County Welfare Board was decided on January 10, 1973 unanimously (9–0). The Court reversed the lower court's decision. Justice William O. Douglas wrote the opinion of the Court. SCDB classifies its main issue as “Poverty law, statutory welfare benefits” in the Civil Rights area. SCDB records that the Court declared a state or territorial law, regulation or constitutional provision unconstitutional.
Read the opinion
Case details
- Citations
- 409 U.S. 413 · 93 S. Ct. 590 · 34 L. Ed. 2d 608 · 1973 U.S. LEXIS 161
- Docket number
- 71-5656
- Decided
- January 10, 1973
- Argued
- December 4, 1972
- Court era
- Burger Court
- Decision type
- Opinion of the Court (orally argued)
- Disposition
- Reversed
- Outcome for petitioner
- The petitioning party received a favorable disposition
- Vote
- 9–0 (unanimous)
- Majority opinion
- William O. Douglas
- Opinion assigned by
- Warren E. Burger
- How the case arrived
- Certiorari
- Issue (SCDB)
- Poverty law, statutory welfare benefits
- Issue area
- Civil Rights
- Legal provision
- Social Security Act
- Type of law
- Federal statute
- Held unconstitutional
- A state or territorial law, regulation or constitutional provision
- Decision direction (SCDB)
- Liberal what this means
How the Justices voted
| Justice | Vote | Separate writing |
|---|---|---|
| Justice William O. Douglas | Majority | Wrote an opinion |
| Justice William J. Brennan Jr. | Majority | |
| Justice Potter Stewart | Majority | |
| Justice Byron R. White | Majority | |
| Justice Thurgood Marshall | Majority | |
| Chief Justice Warren E. Burger | Majority | |
| Justice Harry A. Blackmun | Majority | |
| Justice Lewis F. Powell Jr. | Majority | |
| Justice William H. Rehnquist | Majority |
Full case caption
Philpott et al. v. Essex County Welfare Board
SCDB identifiers: case 1972-032, docket 1972-032-01.
Related decisions
Other cases on “Poverty law, statutory welfare benefits”
- New York State Department of Social Services v. Dublino
- Carleson v. Remillard
- Richardson v. Wright
- Engelman v. Amos
- Hagans v. Lavine
- Shea v. Vialpando
Cases on the same legal provision: Social Security Act
- Richardson v. Perales
- Mathews v. de Castro
- Califano v. GoldfarbLaw held unconstitutional
- Hopkins v. Cohen
- Califano v. Torres
- Heckler v. Mathews
Same Term, same area (Civil Rights)
- District of Columbia v. Carter
- United States v. Kras
- Goosby v. Osser
- Gomez v. PerezLaw held unconstitutional
- Mahan v. HowellLaw held unconstitutional
- Tillman v. Wheaton-Haven Recreation Assn., Inc.
Source: Supreme Court Database, 2026 Release 01 (data file dated September 8, 2026). Imported into CaseTrail November 5, 2026. Coverage: decisions from the 1946 through 2025 Terms. Methodology · Report an error