Goosby v. Osser
409 U.S. 512 · Decided January 17, 1973 · Supreme Court of the United States
Record summary. This page is generated from the Supreme Court Database’s coded data about the case. It describes who decided what, not the Court’s reasoning. Read the opinion itself before relying on it. Not legal advice.
At a glance
Goosby v. Osser was decided on January 17, 1973 unanimously (9–0). The Court reversed the lower court's decision and remanded the case. Justice William J. Brennan Jr. wrote the opinion of the Court. SCDB classifies its main issue as “Voting” in the Civil Rights area.
Read the opinion
Case details
- Citations
- 409 U.S. 512 · 93 S. Ct. 854 · 35 L. Ed. 2d 36 · 1973 U.S. LEXIS 114
- Docket number
- 71-6316
- Decided
- January 17, 1973
- Argued
- December 6, 1972
- Court era
- Burger Court
- Decision type
- Opinion of the Court (orally argued)
- Disposition
- Reversed and remanded
- Outcome for petitioner
- The petitioning party received a favorable disposition
- Vote
- 9–0 (unanimous)
- Majority opinion
- William J. Brennan Jr.
- Opinion assigned by
- Warren E. Burger
- How the case arrived
- Certiorari
- Issue (SCDB)
- Voting
- Issue area
- Civil Rights
- Legal provision
- Article III, Section 2, Paragraph 1 (case or controversy requirement)
- Type of law
- Constitution
- Decision direction (SCDB)
- Liberal what this means
How the Justices voted
| Justice | Vote | Separate writing |
|---|---|---|
| Justice William O. Douglas | Majority | |
| Justice William J. Brennan Jr. | Majority | Wrote an opinion |
| Justice Potter Stewart | Majority | |
| Justice Byron R. White | Majority | |
| Justice Thurgood Marshall | Majority | |
| Chief Justice Warren E. Burger | Majority | |
| Justice Harry A. Blackmun | Majority | |
| Justice Lewis F. Powell Jr. | Majority | |
| Justice William H. Rehnquist | Majority |
Full case caption
Goosby et al. v. Osser et al.
SCDB identifiers: case 1972-040, docket 1972-040-01.
Related decisions
Other cases on “Voting”
- Roudebush v. Hartke
- O'Brien v. SkinnerLaw held unconstitutional
- Richardson v. Ramirez
- Gordon v. Lance
- Oregon v. MitchellLaw held unconstitutional
- Hill v. StoneLaw held unconstitutional
Cases on the same legal provision: Article III, Section 2, Paragraph 1 (case or controversy requirement)
- Gilligan v. Morgan
- Aikens v. California
- O'Shea v. Littleton
- Securities and Exchange Commission v. Medical Committee for Human Rights
- Steffel v. Thompson
- Super Tire Engineering Co. v. McCorkle
Same Term, same area (Civil Rights)
- Philpott v. Essex County Welfare BoardLaw held unconstitutional
- District of Columbia v. Carter
- United States v. Kras
- Gomez v. PerezLaw held unconstitutional
- Mahan v. HowellLaw held unconstitutional
- Tillman v. Wheaton-Haven Recreation Assn., Inc.
Source: Supreme Court Database, 2026 Release 01 (data file dated September 8, 2026). Imported into CaseTrail November 5, 2026. Coverage: decisions from the 1946 through 2025 Terms. Methodology · Report an error