Mahan v. Howell
410 U.S. 315 · Decided February 21, 1973 · Supreme Court of the United States
At a glance
Mahan v. Howell was decided on February 21, 1973 by a vote of 5–3. The Court affirmed the lower court's decision in part and reversed or vacated it in part. Justice William H. Rehnquist wrote the opinion of the Court. SCDB classifies its main issue as “Reapportionment (other than Voting Rights Act plans)” in the Civil Rights area. SCDB records that the Court declared a state or territorial law, regulation or constitutional provision unconstitutional.
Read the opinion
Case details
- Citations
- 410 U.S. 315 · 93 S. Ct. 979 · 35 L. Ed. 2d 320 · 1973 U.S. LEXIS 108
- Docket number
- 71-364
- Decided
- February 21, 1973
- Argued
- December 12, 1972
- Court era
- Burger Court
- Decision type
- Opinion of the Court (orally argued)
- Disposition
- Affirmed and reversed (or vacated) in part
- Outcome for petitioner
- The petitioning party received a favorable disposition
- Vote
- 5–3
- Majority opinion
- William H. Rehnquist
- Opinion assigned by
- Warren E. Burger
- How the case arrived
- Appeal
- Issue area
- Civil Rights
- Legal provision
- Fourteenth Amendment (equal protection)
- Type of law
- Constitutional amendment
- Held unconstitutional
- A state or territorial law, regulation or constitutional provision
- Decision direction (SCDB)
- Conservative what this means
How the Justices voted
| Justice | Vote | Separate writing |
|---|---|---|
| Justice William O. Douglas | Dissent | |
| Justice William J. Brennan Jr. | Dissent | Wrote an opinion |
| Justice Potter Stewart | Majority | |
| Justice Byron R. White | Majority | |
| Justice Thurgood Marshall | Dissent | |
| Chief Justice Warren E. Burger | Majority | |
| Justice Harry A. Blackmun | Majority | |
| Justice William H. Rehnquist | Majority | Wrote an opinion |
Did not participate: Lewis F. Powell Jr..
Full case caption
Mahan, Secretary, State Board of Elections, et al. v. Howell et al.
SCDB identifiers: case 1972-054, docket 1972-054-01.
Related decisions
Other cases on “Reapportionment (other than Voting Rights Act plans)”
- Salyer Land Co. v. Tulare Lake Basin Water Storage District
- Associated Enterprises, Inc. v. Toltec Watershed Improvement District
- Gaffney v. Cummings
- White v. RegesterLaw held unconstitutional
- White v. WeiserLaw held unconstitutional
- Taylor v. McKeithen
Cases on the same legal provision: Fourteenth Amendment (equal protection)
- McGinnis v. Royster
- Lehnhausen v. Lake Shore Auto Parts Co.Altered precedent
- Marston v. Lewis
- Burns v. Fortson
- San Antonio Independent School District v. Rodriguez
- Gomez v. PerezLaw held unconstitutional
Same Term, same area (Civil Rights)
- Philpott v. Essex County Welfare BoardLaw held unconstitutional
- District of Columbia v. Carter
- United States v. Kras
- Goosby v. Osser
- Gomez v. PerezLaw held unconstitutional
- Tillman v. Wheaton-Haven Recreation Assn., Inc.
Source: Supreme Court Database, 2026 Release 01 (data file dated September 8, 2026). Imported into CaseTrail November 5, 2026. Coverage: decisions from the 1946 through 2025 Terms. Methodology · Report an error