Gomez v. Perez
409 U.S. 535 · Decided January 17, 1973 · Supreme Court of the United States
At a glance
Gomez v. Perez was decided on January 17, 1973 by a vote of 7–2. The Court reversed the lower court's decision and remanded the case. The decision was issued per curiam (an unsigned opinion of the Court). SCDB classifies its main issue as “Rights of illegitimates” in the Civil Rights area. SCDB records that the Court declared a state or territorial law, regulation or constitutional provision unconstitutional.
Read the opinion
Case details
- Citations
- 409 U.S. 535 · 93 S. Ct. 872 · 35 L. Ed. 2d 56 · 1973 U.S. LEXIS 116
- Docket number
- 71-575
- Decided
- January 17, 1973
- Argued
- December 6, 1972
- Court era
- Burger Court
- Decision type
- Per curiam (orally argued)
- Disposition
- Reversed and remanded
- Outcome for petitioner
- The petitioning party received a favorable disposition
- Vote
- 7–2
- Opinion assigned by
- Warren E. Burger
- How the case arrived
- Appeal
- Issue (SCDB)
- Rights of illegitimates
- Issue area
- Civil Rights
- Legal provision
- Fourteenth Amendment (equal protection)
- Type of law
- Constitutional amendment
- Held unconstitutional
- A state or territorial law, regulation or constitutional provision
- Decision direction (SCDB)
- Liberal what this means
How the Justices voted
| Justice | Vote | Separate writing |
|---|---|---|
| Justice William O. Douglas | Majority | |
| Justice William J. Brennan Jr. | Majority | |
| Justice Potter Stewart | Jurisdictional dissent | Wrote an opinion |
| Justice Byron R. White | Majority | |
| Justice Thurgood Marshall | Majority | |
| Chief Justice Warren E. Burger | Majority | |
| Justice Harry A. Blackmun | Majority | |
| Justice Lewis F. Powell Jr. | Majority | |
| Justice William H. Rehnquist | Jurisdictional dissent |
Full case caption
Gomez v. Perez
SCDB identifiers: case 1972-042, docket 1972-042-01.
Related decisions
Other cases on “Rights of illegitimates”
- Linda R. S. v. Richard D.
- New Jersey Welfare Rights Organization v. CahillLaw held unconstitutional
- Weber v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co.Law held unconstitutional
- Willis v. Prudential Insurance Company of America
- Jimenez v. WeinbergerLaw held unconstitutional
- Labine v. Vincent
Cases on the same legal provision: Fourteenth Amendment (equal protection)
- McGinnis v. Royster
- Mahan v. HowellLaw held unconstitutional
- Lehnhausen v. Lake Shore Auto Parts Co.Altered precedent
- Marston v. Lewis
- Burns v. Fortson
- Salyer Land Co. v. Tulare Lake Basin Water Storage District
Same Term, same area (Civil Rights)
- Philpott v. Essex County Welfare BoardLaw held unconstitutional
- District of Columbia v. Carter
- United States v. Kras
- Goosby v. Osser
- Mahan v. HowellLaw held unconstitutional
- Tillman v. Wheaton-Haven Recreation Assn., Inc.
Source: Supreme Court Database, 2026 Release 01 (data file dated September 8, 2026). Imported into CaseTrail November 5, 2026. Coverage: decisions from the 1946 through 2025 Terms. Methodology · Report an error