Central Railroad Company of Pennsylvania v. Pennsylvania
370 U.S. 607 · Decided June 25, 1962 · Supreme Court of the United States
At a glance
Central Railroad Company of Pennsylvania v. Pennsylvania was decided on June 25, 1962 unanimously (7–0). The Court vacated the lower court's decision and remanded the case. Justice John M. Harlan II wrote the opinion of the Court. SCDB classifies its main issue as “State or local government tax” in the Economic Activity area. SCDB records that the Court declared a state or territorial law, regulation or constitutional provision unconstitutional.
Read the opinion
Case details
- Citations
- 370 U.S. 607 · 82 S. Ct. 1297 · 8 L. Ed. 2d 720 · 1962 U.S. LEXIS 848
- Docket number
- 400
- Decided
- June 25, 1962
- Argued
- March 20, 1962
- Court era
- Warren Court
- Decision type
- Opinion of the Court (orally argued)
- Disposition
- Vacated and remanded
- Outcome for petitioner
- The petitioning party received a favorable disposition
- Vote
- 7–0 (unanimous)
- Majority opinion
- John M. Harlan II
- Opinion assigned by
- Earl Warren
- How the case arrived
- Appeal
- Issue (SCDB)
- State or local government tax
- Issue area
- Economic Activity
- Legal provision
- Article I, Section 8, Paragraph 3 (interstate commerce clause)
- Type of law
- Constitution
- Held unconstitutional
- A state or territorial law, regulation or constitutional provision
- Decision direction (SCDB)
- Conservative what this means
How the Justices voted
| Justice | Vote | Separate writing |
|---|---|---|
| Justice Hugo L. Black | Concurrence | Wrote an opinion |
| Justice William O. Douglas | Special concurrence | Wrote an opinion |
| Justice Tom C. Clark | Majority | |
| Chief Justice Earl Warren | Special concurrence | |
| Justice John M. Harlan II | Majority | Wrote an opinion |
| Justice William J. Brennan Jr. | Majority | |
| Justice Potter Stewart | Special concurrence |
Did not participate: Felix Frankfurter, Byron R. White.
Full case caption
Central Railroad Company of Pennsylvania v. Pennsylvania
SCDB identifiers: case 1961-110, docket 1961-110-01.
Related decisions
Other cases on “State or local government tax”
- State Board of Insurance v. Todd Shipyards Corp.
- State Tax Commission of Utah v. Pacific States Cast Iron Pipe Co.
- Halliburton Oil Well Cementing Co. v. ReilyLaw held unconstitutional
- Alaska v. Arctic Maid
- Moses Lake Homes, Inc. v. Grant County
- Laurens Federal Savings & Loan Assn. v. South Carolina Tax Commission
Cases on the same legal provision: Article I, Section 8, Paragraph 3 (interstate commerce clause)
- Colorado Anti-Discrimination Commission v. Continental Air Lines, Inc.
- Head v. New Mexico Board of Examiners in Optometry
- Eli Lilly & Co. v. Sav-On-Drugs, Inc.
- Polar Ice Cream & Creamery Co. v. AndrewsLaw held unconstitutional
- Huron Portland Cement Co. v. City of Detroit
- Bibb v. Navajo Freight Lines, Inc.Law held unconstitutional
Same Term, same area (Economic Activity)
- Roper v. United States
- Martin v. Walton
- Still v. Norfolk & Western Railway Co.
- Interstate Commerce Commission v. J-T Transport Co., Inc.
- Federal Trade Commission v. Henry Broch & Co.
- United States v. Drum
Source: Supreme Court Database, 2026 Release 01 (data file dated September 8, 2026). Imported into CaseTrail November 5, 2026. Coverage: decisions from the 1946 through 2025 Terms. Methodology · Report an error