CaseTrail

Halliburton Oil Well Cementing Co. v. Reily

373 U.S. 64 · Decided May 13, 1963 · Supreme Court of the United States

Record summary. This page is generated from the Supreme Court Database’s coded data about the case. It describes who decided what, not the Court’s reasoning. Read the opinion itself before relying on it. Not legal advice.

At a glance

Halliburton Oil Well Cementing Co. v. Reily was decided on May 13, 1963 by a vote of 7–2. The Court reversed the lower court's decision and remanded the case. Chief Justice Earl Warren wrote the opinion of the Court. SCDB classifies its main issue as “State or local government tax” in the Economic Activity area. SCDB records that the Court declared a state or territorial law, regulation or constitutional provision unconstitutional.

Read the opinion

Case details

Citations
373 U.S. 64 · 83 S. Ct. 1201 · 10 L. Ed. 2d 202 · 1963 U.S. LEXIS 2490
Docket number
24
Decided
May 13, 1963
Argued
March 26, 1962
Reargued
December 3, 1962
Court era
Warren Court
Decision type
Opinion of the Court (orally argued)
Disposition
Reversed and remanded
Outcome for petitioner
The petitioning party received a favorable disposition
Vote
7–2
Majority opinion
Earl Warren
Opinion assigned by
Earl Warren
How the case arrived
Appeal
Legal provision
Article I, Section 8, Paragraph 3 (interstate commerce clause)
Type of law
Constitution
Held unconstitutional
A state or territorial law, regulation or constitutional provision
Decision direction (SCDB)
Conservative what this means

How the Justices voted

JusticeVoteSeparate writing
Justice Hugo L. BlackDissent
Justice William O. DouglasMajority
Justice Tom C. ClarkDissentWrote an opinion
Chief Justice Earl WarrenMajorityWrote an opinion
Justice John M. Harlan IIMajority
Justice William J. Brennan Jr.Special concurrenceWrote an opinion
Justice Potter StewartMajority
Justice Byron R. WhiteMajority
Justice Arthur J. GoldbergMajority

Full case caption

Halliburton Oil Well Cementing Co. v. Reily, Collector of Revenue of Louisiana

SCDB identifiers: case 1962-095, docket 1962-095-01.

Other cases on “State or local government tax”

See all

Cases on the same legal provision: Article I, Section 8, Paragraph 3 (interstate commerce clause)

Same Term, same area (Economic Activity)

See all

Source: Supreme Court Database, 2026 Release 01 (data file dated September 8, 2026). Imported into CaseTrail November 5, 2026. Coverage: decisions from the 1946 through 2025 Terms. Methodology · Report an error