City of Columbia v. Omni Outdoor Advertising, Inc.
499 U.S. 365 · Decided April 1, 1991 · Supreme Court of the United States
Record summary. This page is generated from the Supreme Court Database’s coded data about the case. It describes who decided what, not the Court’s reasoning. Read the opinion itself before relying on it. Not legal advice.
At a glance
City of Columbia v. Omni Outdoor Advertising, Inc. was decided on April 1, 1991 by a vote of 6–3. The Court reversed the lower court's decision and remanded the case. Justice Antonin Scalia wrote the opinion of the Court. SCDB classifies its main issue as “Antitrust” in the Economic Activity area.
Read the opinion
Case details
- Citations
- 499 U.S. 365 · 111 S. Ct. 1344 · 113 L. Ed. 2d 382 · 1991 U.S. LEXIS 1858
- Docket number
- 89-1671
- Decided
- April 1, 1991
- Argued
- November 28, 1990
- Court era
- Rehnquist Court
- Decision type
- Opinion of the Court (orally argued)
- Disposition
- Reversed and remanded
- Outcome for petitioner
- The petitioning party received a favorable disposition
- Vote
- 6–3
- Majority opinion
- Antonin Scalia
- Opinion assigned by
- William H. Rehnquist
- How the case arrived
- Certiorari
- Issue (SCDB)
- Antitrust
- Issue area
- Economic Activity
- Legal provision
- Sherman Act
- Type of law
- Federal statute
- Decision direction (SCDB)
- Conservative what this means
How the Justices voted
| Justice | Vote | Separate writing |
|---|---|---|
| Justice Byron R. White | Dissent | |
| Justice Thurgood Marshall | Dissent | |
| Justice Harry A. Blackmun | Majority | |
| Chief Justice William H. Rehnquist | Majority | |
| Justice John Paul Stevens | Dissent | Wrote an opinion |
| Justice Sandra Day O'Connor | Majority | |
| Justice Antonin Scalia | Majority | Wrote an opinion |
| Justice Anthony M. Kennedy | Majority | |
| Justice David H. Souter | Majority |
Full case caption
City of Columbia et al. v. Omni Outdoor Advertising, Inc.
SCDB identifiers: case 1990-055, docket 1990-055-01.
Related decisions
Other cases on “Antitrust”
- Summit Health, Ltd. v. Simon J. Pinhas
- Jay Palmer v. BRG of Georgia, Inc.
- Kansas v. Utilicorp United Inc.
- Texaco Inc. v. Ricky Hasbrouck
- Atlantic Richfield Co. v. USA Petroleum Co.
- Eastman Kodak Company v. Image Technical Services, Inc.
Cases on the same legal provision: Sherman Act
- Federal Trade Commission v. Superior Court Trial Lawyers Association
- Rice v. Norman Williams Co.
- Zenith Radio Corp. v. Hazeltine Research, Inc.
- Federal Trade Commission v. Actavis, Inc.
- United Mine Workers of America v. Pennington
- Local Union No. 189 v. Jewel Tea Co., Inc.
Same Term, same area (Economic Activity)
- Mercedel W. Miles v. Apex Marine Corporation
- Jay Palmer v. BRG of Georgia, Inc.
- Arcadia v. Ohio Power Company
- Coy R. Grogan v. Frank J. Garner, Jr.
- McDermott International, Inc. v. Jon C. Wilander
- Trinova Corporation v. Michigan Department of Treasury
Source: Supreme Court Database, 2026 Release 01 (data file dated September 8, 2026). Imported into CaseTrail November 5, 2026. Coverage: decisions from the 1946 through 2025 Terms. Methodology · Report an error