CaseTrail

City of Cuyahoga Falls v. Buckeye Community Hope Foundation

538 U.S. 188 · Decided March 25, 2003 · Supreme Court of the United States

Record summary. This page is generated from the Supreme Court Database’s coded data about the case. It describes who decided what, not the Court’s reasoning. Read the opinion itself before relying on it. Not legal advice.

At a glance

City of Cuyahoga Falls v. Buckeye Community Hope Foundation was decided on March 25, 2003 unanimously (9–0). The Court affirmed the lower court's decision in part, reversed or vacated it in part, and remanded the case. Justice Sandra Day O'Connor wrote the opinion of the Court. SCDB classifies its main issue as “Desegregation (general)” in the Civil Rights area.

Read the opinion

Case details

Citations
538 U.S. 188 · 123 S. Ct. 1389 · 155 L. Ed. 2d 349 · 2003 U.S. LEXIS 2492
Docket number
01-1269
Decided
March 25, 2003
Argued
January 21, 2003
Decision type
Opinion of the Court (orally argued)
Disposition
Affirmed and reversed (or vacated) in part and remanded
Outcome for petitioner
The petitioning party received a favorable disposition
Vote
9–0 (unanimous)
Majority opinion
Sandra Day O'Connor
Opinion assigned by
William H. Rehnquist
How the case arrived
Certiorari
Issue area
Civil Rights
Legal provision
Fourteenth Amendment (due process)
Type of law
Constitutional amendment
Decision direction (SCDB)
Conservative what this means

How the Justices voted

Full case caption

City of Cuyahoga Falls, Ohio, et al. v. Buckeye Community Hope Foundation et al.

SCDB identifiers: case 2002-033, docket 2002-033-01.

Other cases on “Desegregation (general)”

See all

Cases on the same legal provision: Fourteenth Amendment (due process)

Same Term, same area (Civil Rights)

See all

Source: Supreme Court Database, 2026 Release 01 (data file dated September 8, 2026). Imported into CaseTrail November 5, 2026. Coverage: decisions from the 1946 through 2025 Terms. Methodology · Report an error