CaseTrail

State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company v. Inez Preece Campbell and Matthew C. Barneck

538 U.S. 408 · Decided April 7, 2003 · Supreme Court of the United States

Record summary. This page is generated from the Supreme Court Database’s coded data about the case. It describes who decided what, not the Court’s reasoning. Read the opinion itself before relying on it. Not legal advice.

At a glance

State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company v. Inez Preece Campbell and Matthew C. Barneck was decided on April 7, 2003 by a vote of 6–3. The Court reversed the lower court's decision and remanded the case. Justice Anthony M. Kennedy wrote the opinion of the Court. SCDB classifies its main issue as “Punitive damages” in the Economic Activity area.

Read the opinion

Case details

Citations
538 U.S. 408 · 123 S. Ct. 1513 · 155 L. Ed. 2d 585 · 2003 U.S. LEXIS 2713
Docket number
01-1289
Decided
April 7, 2003
Argued
December 11, 2002
Decision type
Opinion of the Court (orally argued)
Disposition
Reversed and remanded
Outcome for petitioner
The petitioning party received a favorable disposition
Vote
6–3
Majority opinion
Anthony M. Kennedy
Opinion assigned by
William H. Rehnquist
How the case arrived
Certiorari
Issue (SCDB)
Punitive damages
Legal provision
Fourteenth Amendment (due process)
Type of law
Constitutional amendment
Decision direction (SCDB)
Conservative what this means

How the Justices voted

JusticeVoteSeparate writing
Chief Justice William H. RehnquistMajority
Justice John Paul StevensMajority
Justice Sandra Day O'ConnorMajority
Justice Antonin ScaliaDissentWrote an opinion
Justice Anthony M. KennedyMajorityWrote an opinion
Justice David H. SouterMajority
Justice Clarence ThomasDissentWrote an opinion
Justice Ruth Bader GinsburgDissentWrote an opinion
Justice Stephen G. BreyerMajority

Full case caption

State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company v. Inez Preece Campbell and Matthew C. Barneck, Special Administrator and Personal Representative of the Estate of Curtis B. Campbell

SCDB identifiers: case 2002-041, docket 2002-041-01.

Other cases on “Punitive damages”

See all

Cases on the same legal provision: Fourteenth Amendment (due process)

Same Term, same area (Economic Activity)

See all

Source: Supreme Court Database, 2026 Release 01 (data file dated September 8, 2026). Imported into CaseTrail November 5, 2026. Coverage: decisions from the 1946 through 2025 Terms. Methodology · Report an error