Concrete Pipe and Products of California, Inc. v. Construction Laborers Pension Trust for Southern California
508 U.S. 602 · Decided June 14, 1993 · Supreme Court of the United States
At a glance
Concrete Pipe and Products of California, Inc. v. Construction Laborers Pension Trust for Southern California was decided on June 14, 1993 unanimously (9–0). The Court affirmed the lower court's decision. Justice David H. Souter wrote the opinion of the Court. SCDB classifies its main issue as “Employee Retirement Income Security Act” in the Economic Activity area.
Read the opinion
Case details
- Citations
- 508 U.S. 602 · 113 S. Ct. 2264 · 124 L. Ed. 2d 539 · 1993 U.S. LEXIS 4053
- Docket number
- 91-904
- Decided
- June 14, 1993
- Argued
- December 1, 1992
- Court era
- Rehnquist Court
- Decision type
- Opinion of the Court (orally argued)
- Disposition
- Affirmed
- Outcome for petitioner
- The petitioning party did not receive a favorable disposition
- Vote
- 9–0 (unanimous)
- Majority opinion
- David H. Souter
- Opinion assigned by
- William H. Rehnquist
- How the case arrived
- Certiorari
- Issue (SCDB)
- Employee Retirement Income Security Act
- Issue area
- Economic Activity
- Legal provision
- Employee Retirement Income Security Act (ERISA)
- Type of law
- Federal statute
- Decision direction (SCDB)
- Liberal what this means
How the Justices voted
| Justice | Vote | Separate writing |
|---|---|---|
| Justice Byron R. White | Majority | |
| Justice Harry A. Blackmun | Majority | |
| Chief Justice William H. Rehnquist | Majority | |
| Justice John Paul Stevens | Majority | |
| Justice Sandra Day O'Connor | Concurrence | Wrote an opinion |
| Justice Antonin Scalia | Majority | |
| Justice Anthony M. Kennedy | Majority | |
| Justice David H. Souter | Majority | Wrote an opinion |
| Justice Clarence Thomas | Special concurrence | Wrote an opinion |
Full case caption
Concrete Pipe and Products of California, Inc. v. Construction Laborers Pension Trust for Southern California
SCDB identifiers: case 1992-095, docket 1992-095-01.
Related decisions
Other cases on “Employee Retirement Income Security Act”
- William J. Mertens v. Hewitt Associates
- John Hancock Mutual Life Insurance Company v. Harris Trust and Savings Bank
- Nationwide Mutual Insurance Company v. Robert T. Darden
- Milwaukee Brewery Workers' Pension Plan v. Jos. Schlitz Brewing Company and Stroh Brewery Company
- Curtiss-Wright Corporation v. Frank C. Schoonejongen
- D. Grant Peacock v. Jack L. Thomas
Cases on the same legal provision: Employee Retirement Income Security Act (ERISA)
- The District of Columbia and Sharon Pratt Kelly v. the Greater Washington Board of Trade
- New York State Conference of Blue Cross & Blue Shield Plans v. Travelers Insurance Company
- Ingersoll-Rand Company v. Perry McClendon
- FMC Corporation v. Cynthia Ann Holliday
- Guidry v. Sheet Metal Workers National Pension Fund
- California Division of Labor Standards Enforcement v. Dillingham Construction, N. A., Inc.
Same Term, same area (Economic Activity)
- Bath Iron Works Corporation v. Director
- Spectrum Sports, Inc. v. Shirley McQuillan
- Itel Containers International Corporation v. Joe Huddleston
- Bob Reves v. Ernst & Young
- Sandra Jean Smith v. United States
- Saudi Arabia v. Scott Nelson et Ux.
Source: Supreme Court Database, 2026 Release 01 (data file dated September 8, 2026). Imported into CaseTrail November 5, 2026. Coverage: decisions from the 1946 through 2025 Terms. Methodology · Report an error