Itel Containers International Corporation v. Joe Huddleston
507 U.S. 60 · Decided February 23, 1993 · Supreme Court of the United States
Record summary. This page is generated from the Supreme Court Database’s coded data about the case. It describes who decided what, not the Court’s reasoning. Read the opinion itself before relying on it. Not legal advice.
At a glance
Itel Containers International Corporation v. Joe Huddleston was decided on February 23, 1993 by a vote of 8–1. The Court affirmed the lower court's decision. Justice Anthony M. Kennedy wrote the opinion of the Court. SCDB classifies its main issue as “State or local government tax” in the Economic Activity area.
Read the opinion
Case details
- Citations
- 507 U.S. 60 · 113 S. Ct. 1095 · 122 L. Ed. 2d 421 · 1993 U.S. LEXIS 1778
- Docket number
- 91-321
- Decided
- February 23, 1993
- Argued
- October 14, 1992
- Court era
- Rehnquist Court
- Decision type
- Opinion of the Court (orally argued)
- Disposition
- Affirmed
- Outcome for petitioner
- The petitioning party did not receive a favorable disposition
- Vote
- 8–1
- Majority opinion
- Anthony M. Kennedy
- Opinion assigned by
- William H. Rehnquist
- How the case arrived
- Certiorari
- Issue (SCDB)
- State or local government tax
- Issue area
- Economic Activity
- Legal provision
- Article I, Section 8, Paragraph 3 (interstate commerce clause)
- Type of law
- Constitution
- Decision direction (SCDB)
- Liberal what this means
How the Justices voted
| Justice | Vote | Separate writing |
|---|---|---|
| Justice Byron R. White | Majority | |
| Justice Harry A. Blackmun | Dissent | Wrote an opinion |
| Chief Justice William H. Rehnquist | Majority | |
| Justice John Paul Stevens | Majority | |
| Justice Sandra Day O'Connor | Majority | |
| Justice Antonin Scalia | Special concurrence | Wrote an opinion |
| Justice Anthony M. Kennedy | Majority | Wrote an opinion |
| Justice David H. Souter | Majority | |
| Justice Clarence Thomas | Majority |
Full case caption
Itel Containers International Corporation v. Joe Huddleston, Commissioner of Revenue of Tennessee
SCDB identifiers: case 1992-031, docket 1992-031-01.
Related decisions
Other cases on “State or local government tax”
- Wisconsin Department of Revenue v. William Wrigley, Jr., Co.
- Stephanie Nordlinger v. Kenneth Hahn
- Kraft General Foods, Inc. v. Iowa Department of Revenue and FinanceLaw held unconstitutional
- Allied-Signal, Inc. v. Director
- Chemical Waste Management, Inc. v. Guy HuntLaw held unconstitutional
- Quill Corporation v. North Dakota by and Through Its Tax CommissionerAltered precedentLaw held unconstitutional
Cases on the same legal provision: Article I, Section 8, Paragraph 3 (interstate commerce clause)
- New York v. United StatesLaw held unconstitutional
- Fort Gratiot Sanitary Landfill, Inc. v. Michigan Department of Natural ResourcesLaw held unconstitutional
- State of Wyoming v. State of OklahomaLaw held unconstitutional
- C & a Carbone, Inc. v. Town of ClarkstownLaw held unconstitutional
- West Lynn Creamery, Inc. v. Jonathan HealyLaw held unconstitutional
- Healy v. the Beer InstituteAltered precedentLaw held unconstitutional
Same Term, same area (Economic Activity)
- Bath Iron Works Corporation v. Director
- Spectrum Sports, Inc. v. Shirley McQuillan
- Bob Reves v. Ernst & Young
- Sandra Jean Smith v. United States
- Saudi Arabia v. Scott Nelson et Ux.
- Pioneer Investment Services Company v. Brunswick Associates Limited Partnership
Source: Supreme Court Database, 2026 Release 01 (data file dated September 8, 2026). Imported into CaseTrail November 5, 2026. Coverage: decisions from the 1946 through 2025 Terms. Methodology · Report an error