C & a Carbone, Inc. v. Town of Clarkstown
511 U.S. 383 · Decided May 16, 1994 · Supreme Court of the United States
At a glance
C & a Carbone, Inc. v. Town of Clarkstown was decided on May 16, 1994 by a vote of 6–3. The Court reversed the lower court's decision. Justice Anthony M. Kennedy wrote the opinion of the Court. SCDB classifies its main issue as “State or local business regulation” in the Economic Activity area. SCDB records that the Court declared a municipal or other local ordinance unconstitutional.
Read the opinion
Case details
- Citations
- 511 U.S. 383 · 114 S. Ct. 1677 · 128 L. Ed. 2d 399 · 1994 U.S. LEXIS 3477
- Docket number
- 92-1402
- Decided
- May 16, 1994
- Argued
- December 7, 1993
- Court era
- Rehnquist Court
- Decision type
- Opinion of the Court (orally argued)
- Disposition
- Reversed
- Outcome for petitioner
- The petitioning party received a favorable disposition
- Vote
- 6–3
- Majority opinion
- Anthony M. Kennedy
- Opinion assigned by
- John Paul Stevens
- How the case arrived
- Certiorari
- Issue (SCDB)
- State or local business regulation
- Issue area
- Economic Activity
- Legal provision
- Article I, Section 8, Paragraph 3 (interstate commerce clause)
- Type of law
- Constitution
- Held unconstitutional
- A municipal or other local ordinance
- Decision direction (SCDB)
- Conservative what this means
How the Justices voted
| Justice | Vote | Separate writing |
|---|---|---|
| Justice Harry A. Blackmun | Dissent | |
| Chief Justice William H. Rehnquist | Dissent | |
| Justice John Paul Stevens | Majority | |
| Justice Sandra Day O'Connor | Special concurrence | Wrote an opinion |
| Justice Antonin Scalia | Majority | |
| Justice Anthony M. Kennedy | Majority | Wrote an opinion |
| Justice David H. Souter | Dissent | Wrote an opinion |
| Justice Clarence Thomas | Majority | |
| Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg | Majority |
Full case caption
C & a Carbone, Inc., et al. v. Town of Clarkstown, New York
SCDB identifiers: case 1993-048, docket 1993-048-01.
Related decisions
Other cases on “State or local business regulation”
- Fort Gratiot Sanitary Landfill, Inc. v. Michigan Department of Natural ResourcesLaw held unconstitutional
- General Motors Corporation v. Evert Romein
- Healy v. the Beer InstituteAltered precedentLaw held unconstitutional
- Northwest Central Pipeline Corp. v. State Corporation Commission of Kansas
- CTS Corp. v. Dynamics Corporation of America
- Maine v. Taylor
Cases on the same legal provision: Article I, Section 8, Paragraph 3 (interstate commerce clause)
- Associated Industries of Missouri v. Janette M. LohmanLaw held unconstitutional
- West Lynn Creamery, Inc. v. Jonathan HealyLaw held unconstitutional
- Barclays Bank PLC v. Franchise Tax Board of California
- Oregon Waste Systems, Inc. v. Department of Environmental Quality of the State of OregonLaw held unconstitutional
- Oklahoma Tax Commission v. Jefferson Lines, Inc.
- Itel Containers International Corporation v. Joe Huddleston
Same Term, same area (Economic Activity)
- John Hancock Mutual Life Insurance Company v. Harris Trust and Savings Bank
- Department of Revenue of Oregon v. Acf Industries, Inc.
- Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation v. John H. Meyer
- Luther R. Campbell aka Luke Skyywalker v. Acuff-Rose Music, Inc.
- Oregon Waste Systems, Inc. v. Department of Environmental Quality of the State of OregonLaw held unconstitutional
- Central Bank of Denver, N. A. v. First Interstate Bank of Denver, N. A. and Jack K. Naber
Source: Supreme Court Database, 2026 Release 01 (data file dated September 8, 2026). Imported into CaseTrail November 5, 2026. Coverage: decisions from the 1946 through 2025 Terms. Methodology · Report an error