Consumer Financial Protection Bureau v. Community Financial Services Association of America
601 U.S. 416 · Decided May 16, 2024 · Supreme Court of the United States
At a glance
Consumer Financial Protection Bureau v. Community Financial Services Association of America was decided on May 16, 2024 by a vote of 7–2. The Court reversed the lower court's decision and remanded the case. Justice Clarence Thomas wrote the opinion of the Court. SCDB classifies its main issue as “Executive authority versus Congress or the states” in the Miscellaneous area.
Read the opinion
Case details
- Citations
- 601 U.S. 416 · 144 S. Ct. 1474 · 218 L. Ed. 2d 455 · 2024 U.S. LEXIS 2169
- Docket number
- 22-448
- Decided
- May 16, 2024
- Argued
- October 3, 2023
- Court era
- Roberts Court
- Decision type
- Opinion of the Court (orally argued)
- Disposition
- Reversed and remanded
- Outcome for petitioner
- The petitioning party received a favorable disposition
- Vote
- 7–2
- Majority opinion
- Clarence Thomas
- Opinion assigned by
- John G. Roberts Jr.
- How the case arrived
- Certiorari
- Issue area
- Miscellaneous
- Legal provision
- Article I, Section 9, Paragraph 7 (appropriations clause)
- Type of law
- Constitution
- Decision direction (SCDB)
- Liberal what this means
How the Justices voted
| Justice | Vote | Separate writing |
|---|---|---|
| Justice Clarence Thomas | Majority | Wrote an opinion |
| Chief Justice John G. Roberts Jr. | Majority | |
| Justice Samuel A. Alito Jr. | Dissent | Wrote an opinion |
| Justice Sonia Sotomayor | Concurrence | |
| Justice Elena Kagan | Concurrence | Wrote an opinion |
| Justice Neil M. Gorsuch | Dissent | |
| Justice Brett M. Kavanaugh | Concurrence | |
| Justice Amy Coney Barrett | Concurrence | |
| Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson | Concurrence | Wrote an opinion |
Full case caption
Consumer Financial Protection Bureau v. Community Financial Services Association of America, Limited
SCDB identifiers: case 2023-002, docket 2023-002-01.
Related decisions
Other cases on “Executive authority versus Congress or the states”
- Learning Resources v. Trump
- Trump v. SlaughterAltered precedentLaw held unconstitutional
- Collins v. YellenLaw held unconstitutional
- United States v. Arthrex Inc.Law held unconstitutional
- Trump v. Mazars USA
- Seila Law LLC v. Consumer Financial Protection BureauLaw held unconstitutional
Cases on the same legal provision: Article I, Section 9, Paragraph 7 (appropriations clause)
Source: Supreme Court Database, 2026 Release 01 (data file dated September 8, 2026). Imported into CaseTrail November 5, 2026. Coverage: decisions from the 1946 through 2025 Terms. Methodology · Report an error