Seila Law LLC v. Consumer Financial Protection Bureau
140 S. Ct. 2183 · Decided June 29, 2020 · Supreme Court of the United States
At a glance
Seila Law LLC v. Consumer Financial Protection Bureau was decided on June 29, 2020 by a vote of 5–4. The Court vacated the lower court's decision and remanded the case. Chief Justice John G. Roberts Jr. wrote the opinion of the Court. SCDB classifies its main issue as “Executive authority versus Congress or the states” in the Miscellaneous area. SCDB records that the Court declared an act of Congress unconstitutional.
Read the opinion
- CourtListener (Free Law Project) — opinion text
- Supreme Court of the United States — slip opinions, October Term 2019
- Supreme Court of the United States — docket 19-7
Case details
- Citations
- 140 S. Ct. 2183 · 207 L. Ed. 2d 494 · 2020 U.S. LEXIS 3515
- Docket number
- 19-7
- Decided
- June 29, 2020
- Argued
- March 3, 2020
- Court era
- Roberts Court
- Decision type
- Opinion of the Court (orally argued)
- Disposition
- Vacated and remanded
- Outcome for petitioner
- The petitioning party received a favorable disposition
- Vote
- 5–4
- Majority opinion
- John G. Roberts Jr.
- Opinion assigned by
- John G. Roberts Jr.
- How the case arrived
- Certiorari
- Issue area
- Miscellaneous
- Legal provision
- Article II, Section 1 (executive power)
- Type of law
- Constitution
- Held unconstitutional
- An act of Congress
- Decision direction (SCDB)
- Liberal what this means
How the Justices voted
| Justice | Vote | Separate writing |
|---|---|---|
| Justice Clarence Thomas | Concurrence | Wrote an opinion |
| Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg | Dissent | |
| Justice Stephen G. Breyer | Dissent | |
| Chief Justice John G. Roberts Jr. | Majority | Wrote an opinion |
| Justice Samuel A. Alito Jr. | Majority | |
| Justice Sonia Sotomayor | Dissent | |
| Justice Elena Kagan | Dissent | Wrote an opinion |
| Justice Neil M. Gorsuch | Concurrence | |
| Justice Brett M. Kavanaugh | Majority |
Full case caption
Seila Law LLC v. Consumer Financial Protection Bureau
SCDB identifiers: case 2019-071, docket 2019-071-01.
Related decisions
Other cases on “Executive authority versus Congress or the states”
- Trump v. Mazars USA
- United States v. Arthrex Inc.Law held unconstitutional
- Collins v. YellenLaw held unconstitutional
- NLRB v. Sw General, Inc.
- Consumer Financial Protection Bureau v. Community Financial Services Association of America
- Zivotofsky v. KerryLaw held unconstitutional
Cases on the same legal provision: Article II, Section 1 (executive power)
- Trump v. Vance
- Bosse v. Oklahoma
- Trump v. United States
- American Insurance Association v. John Garamendi
- Zschernig v. MillerLaw held unconstitutional
- Ray v. Blair
Same Term, same area (Miscellaneous)
Source: Supreme Court Database, 2026 Release 01 (data file dated September 8, 2026). Imported into CaseTrail November 5, 2026. Coverage: decisions from the 1946 through 2025 Terms. Methodology · Report an error