County of Los Angeles v. Davis
440 U.S. 625 · Decided March 27, 1979 · Supreme Court of the United States
At a glance
County of Los Angeles v. Davis was decided on March 27, 1979 by a vote of 5–4. The Court vacated the lower court's decision and remanded the case. Justice William J. Brennan Jr. wrote the opinion of the Court. SCDB classifies its main issue as “Employment discrimination (race, age, religion, illegitimacy, national origin, working conditions)” in the Civil Rights area.
Read the opinion
Case details
- Citations
- 440 U.S. 625 · 99 S. Ct. 1379 · 59 L. Ed. 2d 642 · 1979 U.S. LEXIS 79
- Docket number
- 77-1553
- Decided
- March 27, 1979
- Argued
- December 5, 1978
- Court era
- Burger Court
- Decision type
- Opinion of the Court (orally argued)
- Disposition
- Vacated and remanded
- Outcome for petitioner
- The petitioning party did not receive a favorable disposition
- Vote
- 5–4
- Majority opinion
- William J. Brennan Jr.
- Opinion assigned by
- William J. Brennan Jr.
- How the case arrived
- Certiorari
- Issue (SCDB)
- Employment discrimination (race, age, religion, illegitimacy, national origin, working conditions)
- Issue area
- Civil Rights
- Legal provision
- Article III, Section 2, Paragraph 1 (case or controversy requirement)
- Type of law
- Constitution
- Decision direction (SCDB)
- Liberal what this means
How the Justices voted
| Justice | Vote | Separate writing |
|---|---|---|
| Justice William J. Brennan Jr. | Majority | Wrote an opinion |
| Justice Potter Stewart | Dissent | Wrote an opinion |
| Justice Byron R. White | Majority | |
| Justice Thurgood Marshall | Majority | |
| Chief Justice Warren E. Burger | Dissent | |
| Justice Harry A. Blackmun | Majority | |
| Justice Lewis F. Powell Jr. | Dissent | Wrote an opinion |
| Justice William H. Rehnquist | Dissent | |
| Justice John Paul Stevens | Majority |
Full case caption
County of Los Angeles et al. v. Davis et al.
SCDB identifiers: case 1978-064, docket 1978-064-01.
Related decisions
Other cases on “Employment discrimination (race, age, religion, illegitimacy, national origin, working conditions)”
- New York City Transit Authority v. Beazer
- Harrah Independent School District v. Martin
- Vance v. Bradley
- Oscar Mayer & Co. v. Evans
- Board of Trustees of Keene State College v. Sweeney
- Furnco Construction Corp. v. Waters
Cases on the same legal provision: Article III, Section 2, Paragraph 1 (case or controversy requirement)
- Babbitt v. United Farm Workers National Union
- Hicklin v. OrbeckLaw held unconstitutional
- Deposit Guaranty National Bank of Jackson v. Roper
- GTE Sylvania, Inc. v. Consumers Union of the United States, Inc.
- United States Parole Commission v. Geraghty
- Andrus v. Idaho
Same Term, same area (Civil Rights)
- Board of Trustees of Keene State College v. Sweeney
- Dougherty County v. White
- Holt Civic Club v. City of Tuscaloosa
- Califano v. Aznavorian
- Lalli v. Lalli
- Duren v. MissouriAltered precedentLaw held unconstitutional
Source: Supreme Court Database, 2026 Release 01 (data file dated September 8, 2026). Imported into CaseTrail November 5, 2026. Coverage: decisions from the 1946 through 2025 Terms. Methodology · Report an error