CaseTrail

Fane Lozman v. the City of Riviera Beach

568 U.S. 115 · Decided January 15, 2013 · Supreme Court of the United States

Record summary. This page is generated from the Supreme Court Database’s coded data about the case. It describes who decided what, not the Court’s reasoning. Read the opinion itself before relying on it. Not legal advice.

At a glance

Fane Lozman v. the City of Riviera Beach was decided on January 15, 2013 by a vote of 7–2. The Court reversed the lower court's decision. Justice Stephen G. Breyer wrote the opinion of the Court. SCDB classifies its main issue as “Due process, takings clause” in the Due Process area.

Read the opinion

Case details

Citations
568 U.S. 115 · 133 S. Ct. 735 · 184 L. Ed. 2d 604 · 2013 U.S. LEXIS 907
Docket number
11-626
Decided
January 15, 2013
Argued
October 1, 2012
Court era
Roberts Court
Decision type
Opinion of the Court (orally argued)
Disposition
Reversed
Outcome for petitioner
The petitioning party received a favorable disposition
Vote
7–2
Majority opinion
Stephen G. Breyer
Opinion assigned by
John G. Roberts Jr.
How the case arrived
Certiorari
Issue area
Due Process
Legal provision
Fifth Amendment (takings clause)
Type of law
Constitutional amendment
Decision direction (SCDB)
Liberal what this means

How the Justices voted

Full case caption

Fane Lozman, Petitioner v. the City of Riviera Beach, Florida

SCDB identifiers: case 2012-010, docket 2012-010-01.

Other cases on “Due process, takings clause”

See all

Cases on the same legal provision: Fifth Amendment (takings clause)

Same Term, same area (Due Process)

See all

Source: Supreme Court Database, 2026 Release 01 (data file dated September 8, 2026). Imported into CaseTrail November 5, 2026. Coverage: decisions from the 1946 through 2025 Terms. Methodology · Report an error