Federal Election Commission v. Ted Cruz for Senate
142 S. Ct. 1638 · Decided May 16, 2022 · Supreme Court of the United States
At a glance
Federal Election Commission v. Ted Cruz for Senate was decided on May 16, 2022 by a vote of 6–3. The Court affirmed the lower court's decision. Chief Justice John G. Roberts Jr. wrote the opinion of the Court. SCDB classifies its main issue as “Campaign spending” in the First Amendment area. SCDB records that the Court declared an act of Congress unconstitutional.
Read the opinion
- CourtListener (Free Law Project) — opinion text
- Supreme Court of the United States — slip opinions, October Term 2021
- Supreme Court of the United States — docket 21-12
Case details
- Citations
- 142 S. Ct. 1638 · 212 L. Ed. 2d 654 · 2022 U.S. LEXIS 2403
- Docket number
- 21-12
- Decided
- May 16, 2022
- Argued
- January 19, 2022
- Court era
- Roberts Court
- Decision type
- Opinion of the Court (orally argued)
- Disposition
- Affirmed
- Outcome for petitioner
- The petitioning party did not receive a favorable disposition
- Vote
- 6–3
- Majority opinion
- John G. Roberts Jr.
- Opinion assigned by
- John G. Roberts Jr.
- How the case arrived
- Appeal
- Issue (SCDB)
- Campaign spending
- Issue area
- First Amendment
- Legal provision
- First Amendment (speech, press, and assembly)
- Type of law
- Constitutional amendment
- Held unconstitutional
- An act of Congress
- Decision direction (SCDB)
- Conservative what this means
How the Justices voted
| Justice | Vote | Separate writing |
|---|---|---|
| Justice Clarence Thomas | Majority | |
| Justice Stephen G. Breyer | Dissent | |
| Chief Justice John G. Roberts Jr. | Majority | Wrote an opinion |
| Justice Samuel A. Alito Jr. | Majority | |
| Justice Sonia Sotomayor | Dissent | |
| Justice Elena Kagan | Dissent | Wrote an opinion |
| Justice Neil M. Gorsuch | Majority | |
| Justice Brett M. Kavanaugh | Majority | |
| Justice Amy Coney Barrett | Majority |
Full case caption
Federal Election Commission v. Ted Cruz for Senate
SCDB identifiers: case 2021-040, docket 2021-040-01.
Related decisions
Other cases on “Campaign spending”
- Thompson v. Hebdon
- National Republican Senatorial Committee v. Federal Election CommissionAltered precedentLaw held unconstitutional
- Williams–yulee v. the Florida Bar
- McCutcheon v. FECLaw held unconstitutional
- American Tradition Partnership, Inc. v. Steve BullockLaw held unconstitutional
- Arizona Free Enterprise Club's Freedom Club Pac v. Ken BennettLaw held unconstitutional
Cases on the same legal provision: First Amendment (speech, press, and assembly)
- Shurtleff v. City of BostonLaw held unconstitutional
- City of Austin v. Reagan National Advertising of Texas Inc
- Houston Community College System v. Wilson
- Mahanoy Area School District v. B.L.
- United States v. Hansen
- Counterman v. Colorado
Same Term, same area (First Amendment)
- Houston Community College System v. Wilson
- Ramirez v. Collier
- City of Austin v. Reagan National Advertising of Texas Inc
- Shurtleff v. City of BostonLaw held unconstitutional
- Carson v. MakinLaw held unconstitutional
- Kennedy v. Bremerton School DistrictAltered precedentLaw held unconstitutional
Source: Supreme Court Database, 2026 Release 01 (data file dated September 8, 2026). Imported into CaseTrail November 5, 2026. Coverage: decisions from the 1946 through 2025 Terms. Methodology · Report an error