City of Austin v. Reagan National Advertising of Texas Inc
142 S. Ct. 1464 · Decided April 21, 2022 · Supreme Court of the United States
Record summary. This page is generated from the Supreme Court Database’s coded data about the case. It describes who decided what, not the Court’s reasoning. Read the opinion itself before relying on it. Not legal advice.
At a glance
City of Austin v. Reagan National Advertising of Texas Inc was decided on April 21, 2022 by a vote of 6–3. The Court reversed the lower court's decision and remanded the case. Justice Sonia Sotomayor wrote the opinion of the Court. SCDB classifies its main issue as “Commercial speech, excluding attorneys” in the First Amendment area.
Read the opinion
- CourtListener (Free Law Project) — opinion text
- Supreme Court of the United States — slip opinions, October Term 2021
- Supreme Court of the United States — docket 20-1029
Case details
- Citations
- 142 S. Ct. 1464 · 212 L. Ed. 2d 418 · 2022 U.S. LEXIS 2098
- Docket number
- 20-1029
- Decided
- April 21, 2022
- Argued
- November 10, 2021
- Court era
- Roberts Court
- Decision type
- Opinion of the Court (orally argued)
- Disposition
- Reversed and remanded
- Outcome for petitioner
- The petitioning party received a favorable disposition
- Vote
- 6–3
- Majority opinion
- Sonia Sotomayor
- Opinion assigned by
- John G. Roberts Jr.
- How the case arrived
- Certiorari
- Issue (SCDB)
- Commercial speech, excluding attorneys
- Issue area
- First Amendment
- Legal provision
- First Amendment (speech, press, and assembly)
- Type of law
- Constitutional amendment
- Decision direction (SCDB)
- Conservative what this means
How the Justices voted
| Justice | Vote | Separate writing |
|---|---|---|
| Justice Clarence Thomas | Dissent | Wrote an opinion |
| Justice Stephen G. Breyer | Concurrence | Wrote an opinion |
| Chief Justice John G. Roberts Jr. | Majority | |
| Justice Samuel A. Alito Jr. | Special concurrence | Wrote an opinion |
| Justice Sonia Sotomayor | Majority | Wrote an opinion |
| Justice Elena Kagan | Majority | |
| Justice Neil M. Gorsuch | Dissent | |
| Justice Brett M. Kavanaugh | Majority | |
| Justice Amy Coney Barrett | Dissent |
Full case caption
City of Austin, Texas v. Reagan National Advertising of Texas Inc
SCDB identifiers: case 2021-017, docket 2021-017-01.
Related decisions
Other cases on “Commercial speech, excluding attorneys”
- Expressions Hair Design v. Schneiderman
- Sorrell v. Ims Health Inc.Law held unconstitutional
- Mike Johanns v. Livestock Marketing Association
- Tommy G. Thompson v. Western States Medical CenterLaw held unconstitutional
- United States and Department of Agriculture v. United Foods, Inc.Law held unconstitutional
- Los Angeles Police Department v. United Reporting Publishing Corporation
Cases on the same legal provision: First Amendment (speech, press, and assembly)
- Shurtleff v. City of BostonLaw held unconstitutional
- Federal Election Commission v. Ted Cruz for SenateLaw held unconstitutional
- Houston Community College System v. Wilson
- Mahanoy Area School District v. B.L.
- United States v. Hansen
- Counterman v. Colorado
Same Term, same area (First Amendment)
- Houston Community College System v. Wilson
- Ramirez v. Collier
- Shurtleff v. City of BostonLaw held unconstitutional
- Federal Election Commission v. Ted Cruz for SenateLaw held unconstitutional
- Carson v. MakinLaw held unconstitutional
- Kennedy v. Bremerton School DistrictAltered precedentLaw held unconstitutional
Source: Supreme Court Database, 2026 Release 01 (data file dated September 8, 2026). Imported into CaseTrail November 5, 2026. Coverage: decisions from the 1946 through 2025 Terms. Methodology · Report an error