Federal Power Commission v. Southern California Edison Co.
376 U.S. 205 · Decided March 2, 1964 · Supreme Court of the United States
Record summary. This page is generated from the Supreme Court Database’s coded data about the case. It describes who decided what, not the Court’s reasoning. Read the opinion itself before relying on it. Not legal advice.
At a glance
Federal Power Commission v. Southern California Edison Co. was decided on March 2, 1964 unanimously (9–0). The Court reversed the lower court's decision. Justice William J. Brennan Jr. wrote the opinion of the Court. SCDB classifies its main issue as “Electric power regulation” in the Economic Activity area.
Read the opinion
Case details
- Citations
- 376 U.S. 205 · 84 S. Ct. 644 · 11 L. Ed. 2d 638 · 1964 U.S. LEXIS 2169
- Docket number
- 71
- Decided
- March 2, 1964
- Argued
- January 14, 1964
- Court era
- Warren Court
- Decision type
- Opinion of the Court (orally argued)
- Disposition
- Reversed
- Outcome for petitioner
- The petitioning party received a favorable disposition
- Vote
- 9–0 (unanimous)
- Majority opinion
- William J. Brennan Jr.
- Opinion assigned by
- Earl Warren
- How the case arrived
- Certiorari
- Issue (SCDB)
- Electric power regulation
- Issue area
- Economic Activity
- Legal provision
- Federal Power Act
- Type of law
- Federal statute
- Decision direction (SCDB)
- Liberal what this means
How the Justices voted
| Justice | Vote | Separate writing |
|---|---|---|
| Justice Hugo L. Black | Majority | |
| Justice William O. Douglas | Majority | |
| Justice Tom C. Clark | Majority | |
| Chief Justice Earl Warren | Majority | |
| Justice John M. Harlan II | Majority | |
| Justice William J. Brennan Jr. | Majority | Wrote an opinion |
| Justice Potter Stewart | Majority | |
| Justice Byron R. White | Majority | |
| Justice Arthur J. Goldberg | Majority |
Full case caption
Federal Power Commission v. Southern California Edison Co. et al.
SCDB identifiers: case 1963-059, docket 1963-059-01.
Related decisions
Other cases on “Electric power regulation”
- Federal Power Commission v. Union Electric Co.
- Federal Power Commission v. Tuscarora Indian Nation
- Atlantic City Electric Co. v. United States
- Gainesville Utilities Department v. Florida Power Corp.
- Federal Power Commission v. Florida Power & Light Co.
- Federal Power Commission v. Sierra Pacific Power Co.
Cases on the same legal provision: Federal Power Act
- Udall v. Federal Power Commission
- City of Tacoma v. Taxpayers of Tacoma
- Federal Power Commission v. Oregon
- Otter Tail Power Co. v. United States
- United States v. Public Utilities Commission of California
- Federal Power Commission v. Idaho Power Co.
Same Term, same area (Economic Activity)
- Tipton v. Socony Mobil Oil Co., Inc.
- Securities and Exchange Commission v. Capital Gains Research Bureau, Inc.
- Dennis v. Denver & Rio Grande Western Railroad Co.
- Eichel v. New York Central Railroad Co.
- Polar Ice Cream & Creamery Co. v. AndrewsLaw held unconstitutional
- United States v. Wiesenfeld Warehouse Co.
Source: Supreme Court Database, 2026 Release 01 (data file dated September 8, 2026). Imported into CaseTrail November 5, 2026. Coverage: decisions from the 1946 through 2025 Terms. Methodology · Report an error