Federal Power Commission v. Tuscarora Indian Nation
362 U.S. 99 · Decided March 7, 1960 · Supreme Court of the United States
Record summary. This page is generated from the Supreme Court Database’s coded data about the case. It describes who decided what, not the Court’s reasoning. Read the opinion itself before relying on it. Not legal advice.
At a glance
Federal Power Commission v. Tuscarora Indian Nation was decided on March 7, 1960 by a vote of 6–3. The Court reversed the lower court's decision. Justice Charles E. Whittaker wrote the opinion of the Court. SCDB classifies its main issue as “Electric power regulation” in the Economic Activity area.
Read the opinion
Case details
- Citations
- 362 U.S. 99 · 80 S. Ct. 543 · 4 L. Ed. 2d 584 · 1960 U.S. LEXIS 1886
- Docket number
- 63
- Decided
- March 7, 1960
- Argued
- December 7, 1959
- Court era
- Warren Court
- Decision type
- Opinion of the Court (orally argued)
- Disposition
- Reversed
- Outcome for petitioner
- The petitioning party received a favorable disposition
- Vote
- 6–3
- Majority opinion
- Charles E. Whittaker
- Opinion assigned by
- Felix Frankfurter
- How the case arrived
- Certiorari
- Issue (SCDB)
- Electric power regulation
- Issue area
- Economic Activity
- Legal provision
- Federal Power Act
- Type of law
- Federal statute
- Decision direction (SCDB)
- Conservative what this means
How the Justices voted
| Justice | Vote | Separate writing |
|---|---|---|
| Justice Hugo L. Black | Dissent | Wrote an opinion |
| Justice Felix Frankfurter | Majority | |
| Justice William O. Douglas | Dissent | |
| Justice Tom C. Clark | Majority | |
| Chief Justice Earl Warren | Dissent | |
| Justice John M. Harlan II | Majority | |
| Justice William J. Brennan Jr. | Special concurrence | |
| Justice Charles E. Whittaker | Majority | Wrote an opinion |
| Justice Potter Stewart | Majority |
Full case caption
Federal Power Commission v. Tuscarora Indian Nation
SCDB identifiers: case 1959-045, docket 1959-045-01.
Related decisions
Other cases on “Electric power regulation”
- Federal Power Commission v. Southern California Edison Co.
- Federal Power Commission v. Sierra Pacific Power Co.
- Federal Power Commission v. Union Electric Co.
- Federal Power Commission v. Niagara Mohawk Power Corp.
- Pennsylvania Water & Power Co. v. Federal Power Commission
- Atlantic City Electric Co. v. United States
Cases on the same legal provision: Federal Power Act
- City of Tacoma v. Taxpayers of Tacoma
- Federal Power Commission v. Oregon
- United States v. Public Utilities Commission of California
- Udall v. Federal Power Commission
- Federal Power Commission v. Idaho Power Co.
- Montana-Dakota Utilities Co. v. Northwestern Public Service Co.
Same Term, same area (Economic Activity)
- Harris v. Pennsylvania Railroad Co.
- Conner v. Butler
- United States v. Seaboard Air Line Railroad Co.
- Sentilles v. Inter-Caribbean Shipping Corp.
- West v. United States
- Braen v. Pfeifer Oil Transportation Co., Inc.
Source: Supreme Court Database, 2026 Release 01 (data file dated September 8, 2026). Imported into CaseTrail November 5, 2026. Coverage: decisions from the 1946 through 2025 Terms. Methodology · Report an error