Federal Power Commission v. Transcontinental Gas Pipe Line Corp.
365 U.S. 1 · Decided January 23, 1961 · Supreme Court of the United States
Record summary. This page is generated from the Supreme Court Database’s coded data about the case. It describes who decided what, not the Court’s reasoning. Read the opinion itself before relying on it. Not legal advice.
At a glance
Federal Power Commission v. Transcontinental Gas Pipe Line Corp. was decided on January 23, 1961 by a vote of 6–3. The Court reversed the lower court's decision. Chief Justice Earl Warren wrote the opinion of the Court. SCDB classifies its main issue as “Gas pipeline regulation” in the Economic Activity area.
Read the opinion
Case details
- Citations
- 365 U.S. 1 · 81 S. Ct. 435 · 5 L. Ed. 2d 377 · 1961 U.S. LEXIS 1937
- Docket number
- 45
- Decided
- January 23, 1961
- Argued
- November 15, 1960
- Court era
- Warren Court
- Decision type
- Opinion of the Court (orally argued)
- Disposition
- Reversed
- Outcome for petitioner
- The petitioning party received a favorable disposition
- Vote
- 6–3
- Majority opinion
- Earl Warren
- Opinion assigned by
- Earl Warren
- How the case arrived
- Certiorari
- Issue (SCDB)
- Gas pipeline regulation
- Issue area
- Economic Activity
- Legal provision
- Natural Gas Act or Natural Gas Policy Act
- Type of law
- Federal statute
- Decision direction (SCDB)
- Liberal what this means
How the Justices voted
| Justice | Vote | Separate writing |
|---|---|---|
| Justice Hugo L. Black | Majority | |
| Justice Felix Frankfurter | Dissent | |
| Justice William O. Douglas | Majority | |
| Justice Tom C. Clark | Majority | |
| Chief Justice Earl Warren | Majority | Wrote an opinion |
| Justice John M. Harlan II | Dissent | Wrote an opinion |
| Justice William J. Brennan Jr. | Majority | |
| Justice Charles E. Whittaker | Majority | |
| Justice Potter Stewart | Dissent |
Full case caption
Federal Power Commission v. Transcontinental Gas Pipe Line Corp. et al.
SCDB identifiers: case 1960-032, docket 1960-032-01.
Related decisions
Other cases on “Gas pipeline regulation”
- Federal Power Commission v. Tennessee Gas Transmission Co.
- United Gas Pipe Line Co. v. Memphis Light
- California v. Lo-Vaca Gathering Co.
- Federal Power Commission v. Amerada Petroleum Corp.
- Federal Power Commission v. United Gas Pipe Line Co.
- Federal Power Commission v. Louisiana Power & Light Co.
Cases on the same legal provision: Natural Gas Act or Natural Gas Policy Act
- Pan American Petroleum Corp. v. Superior Court of Delaware for New Castle County
- Sunray Mid-Continent Oil Co. v. Federal Power Commission
- Sun Oil Co. v. Federal Power Commission
- Texas Gas Transmission Corp. v. Shell Oil Co.
- Atlantic Refining Co. v. Public Service Commission of New York
- Northern Natural Gas Co. v. State Corporation Commission of Kansas
Same Term, same area (Economic Activity)
- Michalic v. Cleveland Tankers, Inc.
- Waterman Steamship Corp. v. Dugan & McNamara, Inc.
- New York v. Henagan
- Thomas v. Virginia
- United States v. Mississippi Valley Generating Co.
- Lewis v. Manufacturers National Bank of Detroit
Source: Supreme Court Database, 2026 Release 01 (data file dated September 8, 2026). Imported into CaseTrail November 5, 2026. Coverage: decisions from the 1946 through 2025 Terms. Methodology · Report an error