Federal Power Commission v. United Gas Pipe Line Co.
386 U.S. 237 · Decided March 13, 1967 · Supreme Court of the United States
Record summary. This page is generated from the Supreme Court Database’s coded data about the case. It describes who decided what, not the Court’s reasoning. Read the opinion itself before relying on it. Not legal advice.
At a glance
Federal Power Commission v. United Gas Pipe Line Co. was decided on March 13, 1967 by a vote of 5–3. The Court reversed the lower court's decision and remanded the case. Justice Byron R. White wrote the opinion of the Court. SCDB classifies its main issue as “Gas pipeline regulation” in the Economic Activity area.
Read the opinion
Case details
- Citations
- 386 U.S. 237 · 87 S. Ct. 1003 · 18 L. Ed. 2d 18 · 1967 U.S. LEXIS 2774
- Docket number
- 127
- Decided
- March 13, 1967
- Argued
- January 11, 1967
- Court era
- Warren Court
- Decision type
- Opinion of the Court (orally argued)
- Disposition
- Reversed and remanded
- Outcome for petitioner
- The petitioning party received a favorable disposition
- Vote
- 5–3
- Majority opinion
- Byron R. White
- Opinion assigned by
- Earl Warren
- How the case arrived
- Certiorari
- Issue (SCDB)
- Gas pipeline regulation
- Issue area
- Economic Activity
- Legal provision
- Natural Gas Act or Natural Gas Policy Act
- Type of law
- Federal statute
- Decision direction (SCDB)
- Liberal what this means
How the Justices voted
| Justice | Vote | Separate writing |
|---|---|---|
| Justice Hugo L. Black | Majority | |
| Justice William O. Douglas | Dissent | |
| Justice Tom C. Clark | Majority | |
| Chief Justice Earl Warren | Majority | |
| Justice John M. Harlan II | Dissent | Wrote an opinion |
| Justice William J. Brennan Jr. | Majority | |
| Justice Potter Stewart | Dissent | |
| Justice Byron R. White | Majority | Wrote an opinion |
Did not participate: Abe Fortas.
Full case caption
Federal Power Commission v. United Gas Pipe Line Co. et al.
SCDB identifiers: case 1966-062, docket 1966-062-01.
Related decisions
Other cases on “Gas pipeline regulation”
- Federal Power Commission v. Amerada Petroleum Corp.
- California v. Lo-Vaca Gathering Co.
- Federal Power Commission v. Tennessee Gas Transmission Co.
- Federal Power Commission v. Louisiana Power & Light Co.
- Federal Power Commission v. Transcontinental Gas Pipe Line Corp.
- Federal Power Commission v. Memphis Light
Cases on the same legal provision: Natural Gas Act or Natural Gas Policy Act
- United Gas Pipe Line Co. v. Federal Power Commission
- Continental Oil Co. v. Federal Power Commission
- Federal Power Commission v. Sunray Dx Oil Co.
- United Gas Improvement Co. v. Callery Properties, Inc.
- United Gas Improvement Co. v. Continental Oil Co.
- Federal Power Commission v. Texaco Inc.
Same Term, same area (Economic Activity)
- United Gas Pipe Line Co. v. Federal Power Commission
- Bank of Marin v. England
- United States v. Acme Process Equipment Co.
- United States v. Demko
- Watkins v. Conway
- Walker v. Southern Railway Co.
Source: Supreme Court Database, 2026 Release 01 (data file dated September 8, 2026). Imported into CaseTrail November 5, 2026. Coverage: decisions from the 1946 through 2025 Terms. Methodology · Report an error