CaseTrail

Fong Foo v. United States

369 U.S. 141 · Decided March 19, 1962 · Supreme Court of the United States

Record summary. This page is generated from the Supreme Court Database’s coded data about the case. It describes who decided what, not the Court’s reasoning. Read the opinion itself before relying on it. Not legal advice.

At a glance

Fong Foo v. United States was decided on March 19, 1962 by a vote of 7–1. The Court reversed the lower court's decision. The decision was issued per curiam (an unsigned opinion of the Court). SCDB classifies its main issue as “Double jeopardy” in the Criminal Procedure area.

Read the opinion

Case details

Citations
369 U.S. 141 · 82 S. Ct. 671 · 7 L. Ed. 2d 629 · 1962 U.S. LEXIS 1600
Docket number
64
Decided
March 19, 1962
Argued
January 16, 1962
Court era
Warren Court
Decision type
Per curiam (orally argued)
Disposition
Reversed
Outcome for petitioner
The petitioning party received a favorable disposition
Vote
7–1
Opinion assigned by
Earl Warren
How the case arrived
Certiorari
Issue (SCDB)
Double jeopardy
Legal provision
Fifth Amendment (double jeopardy)
Type of law
Constitutional amendment
Decision direction (SCDB)
Liberal what this means

How the Justices voted

JusticeVoteSeparate writing
Justice Hugo L. BlackMajority
Justice Felix FrankfurterMajority
Justice William O. DouglasMajority
Justice Tom C. ClarkDissentWrote an opinion
Chief Justice Earl WarrenMajority
Justice John M. Harlan IISpecial concurrenceWrote an opinion
Justice William J. Brennan Jr.Majority
Justice Potter StewartMajority

Did not participate: Charles E. Whittaker.

Full case caption

Fong Foo et al. v. United States

SCDB identifiers: case 1961-048, docket 1961-048-01.

Other cases on “Double jeopardy”

See all

Cases on the same legal provision: Fifth Amendment (double jeopardy)

Same Term, same area (Criminal Procedure)

See all

Source: Supreme Court Database, 2026 Release 01 (data file dated September 8, 2026). Imported into CaseTrail November 5, 2026. Coverage: decisions from the 1946 through 2025 Terms. Methodology · Report an error