Ford Motor Co. v. United States
405 U.S. 562 · Decided March 29, 1972 · Supreme Court of the United States
Record summary. This page is generated from the Supreme Court Database’s coded data about the case. It describes who decided what, not the Court’s reasoning. Read the opinion itself before relying on it. Not legal advice.
At a glance
Ford Motor Co. v. United States was decided on March 29, 1972 by a vote of 5–2. The Court affirmed the lower court's decision. Justice William O. Douglas wrote the opinion of the Court. SCDB classifies its main issue as “Mergers” in the Economic Activity area.
Read the opinion
Case details
- Citations
- 405 U.S. 562 · 92 S. Ct. 1142 · 31 L. Ed. 2d 492 · 1972 U.S. LEXIS 164
- Docket number
- 70-113
- Decided
- March 29, 1972
- Argued
- November 18, 1971
- Court era
- Burger Court
- Decision type
- Opinion of the Court (orally argued)
- Disposition
- Affirmed
- Outcome for petitioner
- The petitioning party did not receive a favorable disposition
- Vote
- 5–2
- Majority opinion
- William O. Douglas
- Opinion assigned by
- William O. Douglas
- How the case arrived
- Appeal
- Issue (SCDB)
- Mergers
- Issue area
- Economic Activity
- Legal provision
- Clayton Act
- Type of law
- Federal statute
- Decision direction (SCDB)
- Liberal what this means
How the Justices voted
| Justice | Vote | Separate writing |
|---|---|---|
| Justice William O. Douglas | Majority | Wrote an opinion |
| Justice William J. Brennan Jr. | Majority | |
| Justice Potter Stewart | Special concurrence | Wrote an opinion |
| Justice Byron R. White | Majority | |
| Justice Thurgood Marshall | Majority | |
| Chief Justice Warren E. Burger | Dissent | Wrote an opinion |
| Justice Harry A. Blackmun | Dissent | Wrote an opinion |
Did not participate: Lewis F. Powell Jr., William H. Rehnquist.
Full case caption
Ford Motor Co. v. United States et al.
SCDB identifiers: case 1971-084, docket 1971-084-01.
Related decisions
Other cases on “Mergers”
- Port of Portland v. United States
- United States v. Greater Buffalo Press, Inc.
- United States v. Armour & Co.
- United States v. Falstaff Brewing Corp.
- United States v. First National Bancorporation, Inc.
- United States v. Phillipsburg National Bank & Trust Co.
Cases on the same legal provision: Clayton Act
- Hawaii v. Standard Oil Co. of California
- California Motor Transport Co. v. Trucking Unlimited
- Zenith Radio Corp. v. Hazeltine Research, Inc.
- Perkins v. Standard Oil Co. of California
- Norfolk Monument Co., Inc. v. Woodlawn Memorial Gardens, Inc.
- Hanover Shoe, Inc. v. United Shoe Machinery Corp.
Same Term, same area (Economic Activity)
- Superintendent of Insurance of New York v. Bankers Life & Casualty Co.
- McClanahan v. Morauer & Hartzell, Inc.
- Norfolk & Western Railroad Co. v. Nemitz
- Chevron Oil Co. v. Huson
- Victory Carriers, Inc. v. Law
- O'Keeffe v. Aerojet-General Shipyards, Inc.
Source: Supreme Court Database, 2026 Release 01 (data file dated September 8, 2026). Imported into CaseTrail November 5, 2026. Coverage: decisions from the 1946 through 2025 Terms. Methodology · Report an error