United States v. Falstaff Brewing Corp.
410 U.S. 526 · Decided February 28, 1973 · Supreme Court of the United States
Record summary. This page is generated from the Supreme Court Database’s coded data about the case. It describes who decided what, not the Court’s reasoning. Read the opinion itself before relying on it. Not legal advice.
At a glance
United States v. Falstaff Brewing Corp. was decided on February 28, 1973 by a vote of 5–2. The Court reversed the lower court's decision and remanded the case. Justice Byron R. White wrote the opinion of the Court. SCDB classifies its main issue as “Mergers” in the Economic Activity area.
Read the opinion
Case details
- Citations
- 410 U.S. 526 · 93 S. Ct. 1096 · 35 L. Ed. 2d 475 · 1973 U.S. LEXIS 130
- Docket number
- 71-873
- Decided
- February 28, 1973
- Argued
- October 17, 1972
- Court era
- Burger Court
- Decision type
- Opinion of the Court (orally argued)
- Disposition
- Reversed and remanded
- Outcome for petitioner
- The petitioning party received a favorable disposition
- Vote
- 5–2
- Majority opinion
- Byron R. White
- Opinion assigned by
- Warren E. Burger
- How the case arrived
- Appeal
- Issue (SCDB)
- Mergers
- Issue area
- Economic Activity
- Legal provision
- Clayton Act
- Type of law
- Federal statute
- Decision direction (SCDB)
- Liberal what this means
How the Justices voted
| Justice | Vote | Separate writing |
|---|---|---|
| Justice William O. Douglas | Concurrence | Wrote an opinion |
| Justice Potter Stewart | Dissent | |
| Justice Byron R. White | Majority | Wrote an opinion |
| Justice Thurgood Marshall | Special concurrence | Wrote an opinion |
| Chief Justice Warren E. Burger | Majority | |
| Justice Harry A. Blackmun | Majority | |
| Justice William H. Rehnquist | Dissent | Wrote an opinion |
Did not participate: William J. Brennan Jr., Lewis F. Powell Jr..
Full case caption
United States v. Falstaff Brewing Corp. et al.
SCDB identifiers: case 1972-067, docket 1972-067-01.
Related decisions
Other cases on “Mergers”
- United States v. First National Bancorporation, Inc.
- Port of Portland v. United States
- Ford Motor Co. v. United States
- United States v. General Dynamics Corp.
- United States v. Marine Bancorporation, Inc.
- United States v. Connecticut National Bank
Cases on the same legal provision: Clayton Act
- Hawaii v. Standard Oil Co. of California
- California Motor Transport Co. v. Trucking Unlimited
- Zenith Radio Corp. v. Hazeltine Research, Inc.
- Perkins v. Standard Oil Co. of California
- Norfolk Monument Co., Inc. v. Woodlawn Memorial Gardens, Inc.
- Brunswick Corp. v. Pueblo Bowl-O-Mat, Inc.
Same Term, same area (Economic Activity)
- Gottschalk v. Benson
- Evco v. JonesLaw held unconstitutional
- Union Oil Co. of California v. the San Jacinto
- Executive Jet Aviation, Inc. v. City of Cleveland
- Heublein, Inc. v. South Carolina Tax Commission
- Ricci v. Chicago Mercantile Exchange
Source: Supreme Court Database, 2026 Release 01 (data file dated September 8, 2026). Imported into CaseTrail November 5, 2026. Coverage: decisions from the 1946 through 2025 Terms. Methodology · Report an error