Fry v. United States
421 U.S. 542 · Decided May 27, 1975 · Supreme Court of the United States
Record summary. This page is generated from the Supreme Court Database’s coded data about the case. It describes who decided what, not the Court’s reasoning. Read the opinion itself before relying on it. Not legal advice.
At a glance
Fry v. United States was decided on May 27, 1975 by a vote of 7–1. The Court affirmed the lower court's decision. Justice Thurgood Marshall wrote the opinion of the Court. SCDB classifies its main issue as “National supremacy, miscellaneous” in the Federalism area.
Read the opinion
Case details
- Citations
- 421 U.S. 542 · 95 S. Ct. 1792 · 44 L. Ed. 2d 363 · 1975 U.S. LEXIS 67
- Docket number
- 73-822
- Decided
- May 27, 1975
- Argued
- November 11, 1974
- Court era
- Burger Court
- Decision type
- Opinion of the Court (orally argued)
- Disposition
- Affirmed
- Outcome for petitioner
- The petitioning party did not receive a favorable disposition
- Vote
- 7–1
- Majority opinion
- Thurgood Marshall
- Opinion assigned by
- Warren E. Burger
- How the case arrived
- Certiorari
- Issue (SCDB)
- National supremacy, miscellaneous
- Issue area
- Federalism
- Legal provision
- Article I, Section 8, Paragraph 3 (interstate commerce clause)
- Type of law
- Constitution
- Decision direction (SCDB)
- Liberal what this means
How the Justices voted
| Justice | Vote | Separate writing |
|---|---|---|
| Justice William O. Douglas | Dissent from denial or dismissal | Wrote an opinion |
| Justice William J. Brennan Jr. | Majority | |
| Justice Potter Stewart | Majority | |
| Justice Byron R. White | Majority | |
| Justice Thurgood Marshall | Majority | Wrote an opinion |
| Chief Justice Warren E. Burger | Majority | |
| Justice Harry A. Blackmun | Majority | |
| Justice Lewis F. Powell Jr. | Majority | |
| Justice William H. Rehnquist | Dissent | Wrote an opinion |
Full case caption
Fry et al. v. United States
SCDB identifiers: case 1974-106, docket 1974-106-01.
Related decisions
Other cases on “National supremacy, miscellaneous”
- General Atomic Co. v. Felter
- Ray v. Atlantic Richfield Co.
- Nash v. Florida Industrial CommissionLaw held unconstitutional
- Commissioner of Internal Revenue v. Estate of Bosch
- Pennhurst State School and Hospital v. HaldermanAltered precedent
- Lawrence County v. Lead-Deadwood School District No. 40-1Law held unconstitutional
Cases on the same legal provision: Article I, Section 8, Paragraph 3 (interstate commerce clause)
- Colonial Pipeline Co. v. Traigle
- Standard Pressed Steel Co. v. Department of Revenue of Washington
- United States v. Mazurie
- Allenberg Cotton Co., Inc. v. Pittman
- Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co., Inc. v. Cottrell
- Hughes v. Alexandria Scrap Corp.
Same Term, same area (Federalism)
- Allenberg Cotton Co., Inc. v. Pittman
- American Radio Assn. v. Mobile Steamship Assn., Inc.
- Cousins v. Wigoda
- Utah v. United States
- United States v. Florida
- United States v. Maine
Source: Supreme Court Database, 2026 Release 01 (data file dated September 8, 2026). Imported into CaseTrail November 5, 2026. Coverage: decisions from the 1946 through 2025 Terms. Methodology · Report an error