CaseTrail

Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co., Inc. v. Cottrell

424 U.S. 366 · Decided February 25, 1976 · Supreme Court of the United States

Record summary. This page is generated from the Supreme Court Database’s coded data about the case. It describes who decided what, not the Court’s reasoning. Read the opinion itself before relying on it. Not legal advice.

At a glance

Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co., Inc. v. Cottrell was decided on February 25, 1976 unanimously (8–0). The Court reversed the lower court's decision and remanded the case. Justice William J. Brennan Jr. wrote the opinion of the Court. SCDB classifies its main issue as “State or local business regulation” in the Economic Activity area.

Read the opinion

Case details

Citations
424 U.S. 366 · 96 S. Ct. 923 · 47 L. Ed. 2d 55 · 1976 U.S. LEXIS 91
Docket number
74-1148
Decided
February 25, 1976
Argued
December 1, 1975
Court era
Burger Court
Decision type
Opinion of the Court (orally argued)
Disposition
Reversed and remanded
Outcome for petitioner
The petitioning party received a favorable disposition
Vote
8–0 (unanimous)
Majority opinion
William J. Brennan Jr.
Opinion assigned by
Warren E. Burger
How the case arrived
Appeal
Legal provision
Article I, Section 8, Paragraph 3 (interstate commerce clause)
Type of law
Constitution
Decision direction (SCDB)
Conservative what this means

How the Justices voted

Did not participate: John Paul Stevens.

Full case caption

Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co., Inc. v. Cottrell, Health Officer of Mississippi

SCDB identifiers: case 1975-037, docket 1975-037-01.

Other cases on “State or local business regulation”

See all

Cases on the same legal provision: Article I, Section 8, Paragraph 3 (interstate commerce clause)

Same Term, same area (Economic Activity)

See all

Source: Supreme Court Database, 2026 Release 01 (data file dated September 8, 2026). Imported into CaseTrail November 5, 2026. Coverage: decisions from the 1946 through 2025 Terms. Methodology · Report an error