Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co., Inc. v. Cottrell
424 U.S. 366 · Decided February 25, 1976 · Supreme Court of the United States
At a glance
Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co., Inc. v. Cottrell was decided on February 25, 1976 unanimously (8–0). The Court reversed the lower court's decision and remanded the case. Justice William J. Brennan Jr. wrote the opinion of the Court. SCDB classifies its main issue as “State or local business regulation” in the Economic Activity area.
Read the opinion
Case details
- Citations
- 424 U.S. 366 · 96 S. Ct. 923 · 47 L. Ed. 2d 55 · 1976 U.S. LEXIS 91
- Docket number
- 74-1148
- Decided
- February 25, 1976
- Argued
- December 1, 1975
- Court era
- Burger Court
- Decision type
- Opinion of the Court (orally argued)
- Disposition
- Reversed and remanded
- Outcome for petitioner
- The petitioning party received a favorable disposition
- Vote
- 8–0 (unanimous)
- Majority opinion
- William J. Brennan Jr.
- Opinion assigned by
- Warren E. Burger
- How the case arrived
- Appeal
- Issue (SCDB)
- State or local business regulation
- Issue area
- Economic Activity
- Legal provision
- Article I, Section 8, Paragraph 3 (interstate commerce clause)
- Type of law
- Constitution
- Decision direction (SCDB)
- Conservative what this means
How the Justices voted
| Justice | Vote | Separate writing |
|---|---|---|
| Justice William J. Brennan Jr. | Majority | Wrote an opinion |
| Justice Potter Stewart | Majority | |
| Justice Byron R. White | Majority | |
| Justice Thurgood Marshall | Majority | |
| Chief Justice Warren E. Burger | Majority | |
| Justice Harry A. Blackmun | Majority | |
| Justice Lewis F. Powell Jr. | Majority | |
| Justice William H. Rehnquist | Majority |
Did not participate: John Paul Stevens.
Full case caption
Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co., Inc. v. Cottrell, Health Officer of Mississippi
SCDB identifiers: case 1975-037, docket 1975-037-01.
Related decisions
Other cases on “State or local business regulation”
- Hughes v. Alexandria Scrap Corp.
- City of New Orleans v. DukesAltered precedent
- United States Trust Company of New York v. New JerseyLaw held unconstitutional
- Hunt v. Washington State Apple Advertising CommissionLaw held unconstitutional
- Southern Overlying Carrier Chapter of the California Dump Truck Owners Association v. Public Utilities Commission of California
- Carter v. MillerLaw held unconstitutional
Cases on the same legal provision: Article I, Section 8, Paragraph 3 (interstate commerce clause)
- National League of Cities v. UseryAltered precedentLaw held unconstitutional
- Fry v. United States
- Colonial Pipeline Co. v. Traigle
- Boston Stock Exchange v. State Tax CommissionLaw held unconstitutional
- Complete Auto Transit, Inc. v. BradyAltered precedent
- Standard Pressed Steel Co. v. Department of Revenue of Washington
Same Term, same area (Economic Activity)
- Day & Zimmermann, Inc. v. Challoner
- Transamerican Freight Lines, Inc. v. Brada Miller Freight Systems, Inc.
- American Foreign Steamship Co. v. Matise
- Foremost-McKesson, Inc. v. Provident Securities Co.
- Michelin Tire Corp. v. WagesAltered precedent
- United States v. Bornstein
Source: Supreme Court Database, 2026 Release 01 (data file dated September 8, 2026). Imported into CaseTrail November 5, 2026. Coverage: decisions from the 1946 through 2025 Terms. Methodology · Report an error