Glover v. St. Louis-San Francisco Railway Co.
393 U.S. 324 · Decided January 14, 1969 · Supreme Court of the United States
Record summary. This page is generated from the Supreme Court Database’s coded data about the case. It describes who decided what, not the Court’s reasoning. Read the opinion itself before relying on it. Not legal advice.
At a glance
Glover v. St. Louis-San Francisco Railway Co. was decided on January 14, 1969 unanimously (9–0). The Court reversed the lower court's decision and remanded the case. Justice Hugo L. Black wrote the opinion of the Court. SCDB classifies its main issue as “Comity, civil rights” in the Judicial Power area.
Read the opinion
Case details
- Citations
- 393 U.S. 324 · 89 S. Ct. 548 · 21 L. Ed. 2d 519 · 1969 U.S. LEXIS 3216
- Docket number
- 38
- Decided
- January 14, 1969
- Argued
- November 14, 1968
- Court era
- Warren Court
- Decision type
- Opinion of the Court (orally argued)
- Disposition
- Reversed and remanded
- Outcome for petitioner
- The petitioning party received a favorable disposition
- Vote
- 9–0 (unanimous)
- Majority opinion
- Hugo L. Black
- Opinion assigned by
- Earl Warren
- How the case arrived
- Certiorari
- Issue (SCDB)
- Comity, civil rights
- Issue area
- Judicial Power
- Legal provision
- Abstention doctrine
- Type of law
- Other
- Decision direction (SCDB)
- Liberal what this means
How the Justices voted
| Justice | Vote | Separate writing |
|---|---|---|
| Justice Hugo L. Black | Majority | Wrote an opinion |
| Justice William O. Douglas | Majority | |
| Chief Justice Earl Warren | Majority | |
| Justice John M. Harlan II | Concurrence | Wrote an opinion |
| Justice William J. Brennan Jr. | Majority | |
| Justice Potter Stewart | Majority | |
| Justice Byron R. White | Majority | |
| Justice Abe Fortas | Majority | |
| Justice Thurgood Marshall | Majority |
Full case caption
Glover et al. v. St. Louis-San Francisco Railway Co. et al.
SCDB identifiers: case 1968-029, docket 1968-029-01.
Related decisions
Other cases on “Comity, civil rights”
- Georgia v. Rachel
- City of Greenwood v. Peacock
- Baines v. City of Danville
- Wallace v. Virginia
- Harris County Commissioners Court v. Moore
- Johnson v. Mississippi
Cases on the same legal provision: Abstention doctrine
Same Term, same area (Judicial Power)
- Federal Power Commission v. United Gas Pipe Line Co.
- Mengelkoch v. Industrial Welfare Commission
- Universal Interpretive Shuttle Corp. v. Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Commission
- Palmieri v. Florida
- Gorun v. Fall
- Black Unity League of Kentucky v. Miller
Source: Supreme Court Database, 2026 Release 01 (data file dated September 8, 2026). Imported into CaseTrail November 5, 2026. Coverage: decisions from the 1946 through 2025 Terms. Methodology · Report an error