Gorun v. Fall
393 U.S. 398 · Decided January 20, 1969 · Supreme Court of the United States
Record summary. This page is generated from the Supreme Court Database’s coded data about the case. It describes who decided what, not the Court’s reasoning. Read the opinion itself before relying on it. Not legal advice.
At a glance
Gorun v. Fall was decided on January 20, 1969 by a vote of 5–4. The Court affirmed the lower court's decision. The decision was issued per curiam (an unsigned opinion of the Court). SCDB classifies its main issue as “Comity, removal cases and foreign tribunals” in the Judicial Power area.
Read the opinion
Case details
- Citations
- 393 U.S. 398 · 89 S. Ct. 678 · 21 L. Ed. 2d 628 · 1969 U.S. LEXIS 2783
- Docket number
- 496
- Decided
- January 20, 1969
- Court era
- Warren Court
- Decision type
- Per curiam (no oral argument)
- Disposition
- Affirmed
- Outcome for petitioner
- The petitioning party did not receive a favorable disposition
- Vote
- 5–4
- Opinion assigned by
- Earl Warren
- How the case arrived
- Appeal
- Issue (SCDB)
- Comity, removal cases and foreign tribunals
- Issue area
- Judicial Power
- Legal provision
- Abstention doctrine
- Type of law
- Other
- Decision direction (SCDB)
- Conservative what this means
How the Justices voted
| Justice | Vote | Separate writing |
|---|---|---|
| Justice Hugo L. Black | Dissent | |
| Justice William O. Douglas | Dissent | Wrote an opinion |
| Chief Justice Earl Warren | Majority | |
| Justice John M. Harlan II | Dissent | |
| Justice William J. Brennan Jr. | Majority | |
| Justice Potter Stewart | Majority | |
| Justice Byron R. White | Majority | |
| Justice Abe Fortas | Dissent | |
| Justice Thurgood Marshall | Majority |
Full case caption
Gorun et al. v. Fall et al.
SCDB identifiers: case 1968-036, docket 1968-036-01.
Related decisions
Other cases on “Comity, removal cases and foreign tribunals”
- Willingham v. Morgan
- Kaiser Steel Corp. v. W. S. Ranch Co.
- Reetz v. Bozanich
- Fornaris v. Ridge Tool Co.
- Askew v. Hargrave
- Grubbs v. General Electric Credit Corp.
Cases on the same legal provision: Abstention doctrine
- Glover v. St. Louis-San Francisco Railway Co.
- Zwickler v. Koota
- Younger v. Harris
- Samuels v. Mackell
- Boyle v. Landry
- Perez v. Ledesma
Same Term, same area (Judicial Power)
- Federal Power Commission v. United Gas Pipe Line Co.
- Mengelkoch v. Industrial Welfare Commission
- Universal Interpretive Shuttle Corp. v. Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Commission
- Palmieri v. Florida
- Glover v. St. Louis-San Francisco Railway Co.
- Black Unity League of Kentucky v. Miller
Source: Supreme Court Database, 2026 Release 01 (data file dated September 8, 2026). Imported into CaseTrail November 5, 2026. Coverage: decisions from the 1946 through 2025 Terms. Methodology · Report an error