CaseTrail

Harris v. Quinn

573 U.S. 616 · Decided June 30, 2014 · Supreme Court of the United States

Record summary. This page is generated from the Supreme Court Database’s coded data about the case. It describes who decided what, not the Court’s reasoning. Read the opinion itself before relying on it. Not legal advice.

At a glance

Harris v. Quinn was decided on June 30, 2014 by a vote of 5–4. The Court affirmed the lower court's decision in part, reversed or vacated it in part, and remanded the case. Justice Samuel A. Alito Jr. wrote the opinion of the Court. SCDB classifies its main issue as “Labor-management right to organize” in the Unions area. SCDB records that the Court declared a state or territorial law, regulation or constitutional provision unconstitutional.

Read the opinion

Case details

Citations
573 U.S. 616 · 134 S. Ct. 2618 · 189 L. Ed. 2d 620 · 2014 U.S. LEXIS 4504
Docket number
11-681
Decided
June 30, 2014
Argued
January 21, 2014
Court era
Roberts Court
Decision type
Opinion of the Court (orally argued)
Disposition
Affirmed and reversed (or vacated) in part and remanded
Outcome for petitioner
The petitioning party received a favorable disposition
Vote
5–4
Majority opinion
Samuel A. Alito Jr.
Opinion assigned by
John G. Roberts Jr.
How the case arrived
Certiorari
Issue area
Unions
Legal provision
First Amendment (speech, press, and assembly)
Type of law
Constitutional amendment
Held unconstitutional
A state or territorial law, regulation or constitutional provision
Decision direction (SCDB)
Conservative what this means

How the Justices voted

Full case caption

Harris v. Quinn

SCDB identifiers: case 2013-071, docket 2013-071-01.

Other cases on “Labor-management right to organize”

See all

Cases on the same legal provision: First Amendment (speech, press, and assembly)

Same Term, same area (Unions)

See all

Source: Supreme Court Database, 2026 Release 01 (data file dated September 8, 2026). Imported into CaseTrail November 5, 2026. Coverage: decisions from the 1946 through 2025 Terms. Methodology · Report an error