McCullen v. Coakley
573 U.S. 464 · Decided June 26, 2014 · Supreme Court of the United States
At a glance
McCullen v. Coakley was decided on June 26, 2014 unanimously (9–0). The Court reversed the lower court's decision and remanded the case. Chief Justice John G. Roberts Jr. wrote the opinion of the Court. SCDB classifies its main issue as “Abortion and contraceptives” in the Privacy area. SCDB records that the Court declared a state or territorial law, regulation or constitutional provision unconstitutional.
Read the opinion
Case details
- Citations
- 573 U.S. 464 · 134 S. Ct. 2518 · 189 L. Ed. 2d 502 · 2014 U.S. LEXIS 4499
- Docket number
- 12-1168
- Decided
- June 26, 2014
- Argued
- January 15, 2014
- Court era
- Roberts Court
- Decision type
- Opinion of the Court (orally argued)
- Disposition
- Reversed and remanded
- Outcome for petitioner
- The petitioning party received a favorable disposition
- Vote
- 9–0 (unanimous)
- Majority opinion
- John G. Roberts Jr.
- Opinion assigned by
- John G. Roberts Jr.
- How the case arrived
- Certiorari
- Issue (SCDB)
- Abortion and contraceptives
- Issue area
- Privacy
- Legal provision
- First Amendment (speech, press, and assembly)
- Type of law
- Constitutional amendment
- Held unconstitutional
- A state or territorial law, regulation or constitutional provision
- Decision direction (SCDB)
- Conservative what this means
How the Justices voted
| Justice | Vote | Separate writing |
|---|---|---|
| Justice Antonin Scalia | Special concurrence | Wrote an opinion |
| Justice Anthony M. Kennedy | Special concurrence | |
| Justice Clarence Thomas | Special concurrence | |
| Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg | Majority | |
| Justice Stephen G. Breyer | Majority | |
| Chief Justice John G. Roberts Jr. | Majority | Wrote an opinion |
| Justice Samuel A. Alito Jr. | Special concurrence | Wrote an opinion |
| Justice Sonia Sotomayor | Majority | |
| Justice Elena Kagan | Majority |
Full case caption
McCullen v. Coakley
SCDB identifiers: case 2013-068, docket 2013-068-01.
Related decisions
Other cases on “Abortion and contraceptives”
- Whole Woman's Health v. HellerstedtLaw held unconstitutional
- National Institute of Family and Life Advocates v. BecerraLaw held unconstitutional
- Box v. Planned Parenthood of Ind. & Ky.
- June Medical Services LLC v. RussoLaw held unconstitutional
- Alberto R. Gonzales v. Leroy CarhartAltered precedent
- Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health OrganizationAltered precedent
Cases on the same legal provision: First Amendment (speech, press, and assembly)
- Harris v. QuinnLaw held unconstitutional
- Lane v. Franks
- McCutcheon v. FECLaw held unconstitutional
- Williams–yulee v. the Florida Bar
- Reed v. Town of GilbertLaw held unconstitutional
- Walker v. Texas Division
Same Term, same area (Privacy)
Source: Supreme Court Database, 2026 Release 01 (data file dated September 8, 2026). Imported into CaseTrail November 5, 2026. Coverage: decisions from the 1946 through 2025 Terms. Methodology · Report an error