National Institute of Family and Life Advocates v. Becerra
138 S. Ct. 2361 · Decided June 26, 2018 · Supreme Court of the United States
At a glance
National Institute of Family and Life Advocates v. Becerra was decided on June 26, 2018 by a vote of 5–4. The Court reversed the lower court's decision and remanded the case. Justice Clarence Thomas wrote the opinion of the Court. SCDB classifies its main issue as “Abortion and contraceptives” in the Privacy area. SCDB records that the Court declared a state or territorial law, regulation or constitutional provision unconstitutional.
Read the opinion
- CourtListener (Free Law Project) — opinion text
- Supreme Court of the United States — slip opinions, October Term 2017
Case details
- Citations
- 138 S. Ct. 2361 · 201 L. Ed. 2d 835 · 2018 U.S. LEXIS 4025
- Docket number
- 16-1140
- Decided
- June 26, 2018
- Argued
- March 20, 2018
- Court era
- Roberts Court
- Decision type
- Opinion of the Court (orally argued)
- Disposition
- Reversed and remanded
- Outcome for petitioner
- The petitioning party received a favorable disposition
- Vote
- 5–4
- Majority opinion
- Clarence Thomas
- Opinion assigned by
- John G. Roberts Jr.
- How the case arrived
- Certiorari
- Issue (SCDB)
- Abortion and contraceptives
- Issue area
- Privacy
- Legal provision
- First Amendment (speech, press, and assembly)
- Type of law
- Constitutional amendment
- Held unconstitutional
- A state or territorial law, regulation or constitutional provision
- Decision direction (SCDB)
- Conservative what this means
How the Justices voted
| Justice | Vote | Separate writing |
|---|---|---|
| Justice Anthony M. Kennedy | Concurrence | Wrote an opinion |
| Justice Clarence Thomas | Majority | Wrote an opinion |
| Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg | Dissent | |
| Justice Stephen G. Breyer | Dissent | Wrote an opinion |
| Chief Justice John G. Roberts Jr. | Concurrence | |
| Justice Samuel A. Alito Jr. | Concurrence | |
| Justice Sonia Sotomayor | Dissent | |
| Justice Elena Kagan | Dissent | |
| Justice Neil M. Gorsuch | Concurrence |
Full case caption
National Institute of Family and Life Advocates v. Becerra
SCDB identifiers: case 2017-041, docket 2017-041-01.
Related decisions
Other cases on “Abortion and contraceptives”
- Box v. Planned Parenthood of Ind. & Ky.
- Whole Woman's Health v. HellerstedtLaw held unconstitutional
- June Medical Services LLC v. RussoLaw held unconstitutional
- Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health OrganizationAltered precedent
- McCullen v. CoakleyLaw held unconstitutional
- Food and Drug Administration v. Alliance for Hippocratic Medicine
Cases on the same legal provision: First Amendment (speech, press, and assembly)
- Janus v. American Federation of StateAltered precedentLaw held unconstitutional
- Lozman v. City of Riviera Beach
- Minnesota Voters Alliance v. ManskyLaw held unconstitutional
- Nieves v. Bartlett
- Manhattan Community Access Corp. v. Halleck
- Iancu v. BrunettiLaw held unconstitutional
Source: Supreme Court Database, 2026 Release 01 (data file dated September 8, 2026). Imported into CaseTrail November 5, 2026. Coverage: decisions from the 1946 through 2025 Terms. Methodology · Report an error