Hilton v. Braunskill
481 U.S. 770 · Decided May 26, 1987 · Supreme Court of the United States
Record summary. This page is generated from the Supreme Court Database’s coded data about the case. It describes who decided what, not the Court’s reasoning. Read the opinion itself before relying on it. Not legal advice.
At a glance
Hilton v. Braunskill was decided on May 26, 1987 by a vote of 6–3. The Court vacated the lower court's decision and remanded the case. Chief Justice William H. Rehnquist wrote the opinion of the Court. SCDB classifies its main issue as “Habeas corpus” in the Criminal Procedure area.
Read the opinion
Case details
- Citations
- 481 U.S. 770 · 107 S. Ct. 2113 · 95 L. Ed. 2d 724 · 1987 U.S. LEXIS 2258
- Docket number
- 86-108
- Decided
- May 26, 1987
- Argued
- March 25, 1987
- Court era
- Rehnquist Court
- Decision type
- Opinion of the Court (orally argued)
- Disposition
- Vacated and remanded
- Outcome for petitioner
- The petitioning party received a favorable disposition
- Vote
- 6–3
- Majority opinion
- William H. Rehnquist
- Opinion assigned by
- William H. Rehnquist
- How the case arrived
- Certiorari
- Issue (SCDB)
- Habeas corpus
- Issue area
- Criminal Procedure
- Legal provision
- Federal Rules of Civil or Appellate Procedure
- Type of law
- Court rules
- Decision direction (SCDB)
- Conservative what this means
How the Justices voted
| Justice | Vote | Separate writing |
|---|---|---|
| Justice William J. Brennan Jr. | Dissent | |
| Justice Byron R. White | Majority | |
| Justice Thurgood Marshall | Dissent | Wrote an opinion |
| Justice Harry A. Blackmun | Dissent | |
| Justice Lewis F. Powell Jr. | Majority | |
| Chief Justice William H. Rehnquist | Majority | Wrote an opinion |
| Justice John Paul Stevens | Majority | |
| Justice Sandra Day O'Connor | Majority | |
| Justice Antonin Scalia | Majority |
Full case caption
Hilton, Superintendent, New Jersey State Prison, et al. v. Braunskill
SCDB identifiers: case 1986-103, docket 1986-103-01.
Related decisions
Other cases on “Habeas corpus”
Cases on the same legal provision: Federal Rules of Civil or Appellate Procedure
- West v. Conrail
- Burlington Northern Railroad Co. v. Woods
- Karcher v. May
- Omni Capital International, Ltd. v. Rudolf Wolff & Co., Ltd.
- City of St. Louis v. James H. Praprotnik
- Mercilyn Buchanan Etc. v. Stanships, Inc.
Same Term, same area (Criminal Procedure)
- Colorado v. Connelly
- Griffith v. Kentucky
- Colorado v. Bertine
- Connecticut v. Barrett
- California v. Brown
- Colorado v. Spring
Source: Supreme Court Database, 2026 Release 01 (data file dated September 8, 2026). Imported into CaseTrail November 5, 2026. Coverage: decisions from the 1946 through 2025 Terms. Methodology · Report an error