Hurst v. Florida
577 U.S. 92 · Decided January 12, 2016 · Supreme Court of the United States
At a glance
Hurst v. Florida was decided on January 12, 2016 by a vote of 8–1. The Court reversed the lower court's decision and remanded the case. Justice Sonia Sotomayor wrote the opinion of the Court. SCDB classifies its main issue as “Jury trial right” in the Criminal Procedure area. SCDB codes this decision as formally altering one or more of the Court's own precedents. SCDB records that the Court declared a state or territorial law, regulation or constitutional provision unconstitutional.
Read the opinion
Case details
- Citations
- 577 U.S. 92 · 136 S. Ct. 616 · 193 L. Ed. 2d 504 · 2016 U.S. LEXIS 619
- Docket number
- 14-7505
- Decided
- January 12, 2016
- Argued
- October 13, 2015
- Court era
- Roberts Court
- Decision type
- Opinion of the Court (orally argued)
- Disposition
- Reversed and remanded
- Outcome for petitioner
- The petitioning party received a favorable disposition
- Vote
- 8–1
- Majority opinion
- Sonia Sotomayor
- Opinion assigned by
- John G. Roberts Jr.
- How the case arrived
- Certiorari
- Issue (SCDB)
- Jury trial right
- Issue area
- Criminal Procedure
- Legal provision
- Sixth Amendment (right to trial by jury)
- Type of law
- Constitutional amendment
- Altered precedent
- Yes — formally altered the Court's precedent
- Held unconstitutional
- A state or territorial law, regulation or constitutional provision
- Decision direction (SCDB)
- Liberal what this means
How the Justices voted
| Justice | Vote | Separate writing |
|---|---|---|
| Justice Antonin Scalia | Majority | |
| Justice Anthony M. Kennedy | Majority | |
| Justice Clarence Thomas | Majority | |
| Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg | Majority | |
| Justice Stephen G. Breyer | Special concurrence | Wrote an opinion |
| Chief Justice John G. Roberts Jr. | Majority | |
| Justice Samuel A. Alito Jr. | Dissent | Wrote an opinion |
| Justice Sonia Sotomayor | Majority | Wrote an opinion |
| Justice Elena Kagan | Majority |
Full case caption
Hurst v. Florida
SCDB identifiers: case 2015-007, docket 2015-007-01.
Related decisions
Other cases on “Jury trial right”
- Deborah K. Johnson v. Tara Sheneva Williams
- United States v. HaymondLaw held unconstitutional
- Ramos v. LouisianaAltered precedentLaw held unconstitutional
- Oregon v. Thomas Eugene Ice
- Perttu v. Richards
- William Joseph Harris v. United States
Cases on the same legal provision: Sixth Amendment (right to trial by jury)
- Pena-Rodriguez v. Colorado
- Jason Pepper v. United StatesLaw held unconstitutional
- John Cunningham v. CaliforniaLaw held unconstitutional
- Ralph Howard Blakely, Jr. v. WashingtonLaw held unconstitutional
- Timothy Stuart Ring v. ArizonaAltered precedentLaw held unconstitutional
- David Riggins v. Nevada
Same Term, same area (Criminal Procedure)
- Maryland v. James Kulbicki
- Chadrin Lee Mullenix v. Beatrice Luna
- Randy White v. Roger L. Wheeler
- Kansas v. Carr
- Montgomery v. Louisiana
- Musacchio v. United States
Source: Supreme Court Database, 2026 Release 01 (data file dated September 8, 2026). Imported into CaseTrail November 5, 2026. Coverage: decisions from the 1946 through 2025 Terms. Methodology · Report an error