CaseTrail

Timothy Stuart Ring v. Arizona

536 U.S. 584 · Decided June 24, 2002 · Supreme Court of the United States

Record summary. This page is generated from the Supreme Court Database’s coded data about the case. It describes who decided what, not the Court’s reasoning. Read the opinion itself before relying on it. Not legal advice.

At a glance

Timothy Stuart Ring v. Arizona was decided on June 24, 2002 by a vote of 7–2. The Court reversed the lower court's decision and remanded the case. Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg wrote the opinion of the Court. SCDB classifies its main issue as “Statutory construction of criminal laws, sentencing guidelines” in the Criminal Procedure area. SCDB codes this decision as formally altering one or more of the Court's own precedents. SCDB records that the Court declared a state or territorial law, regulation or constitutional provision unconstitutional.

Read the opinion

Case details

Citations
536 U.S. 584 · 122 S. Ct. 2428 · 153 L. Ed. 2d 556 · 2002 U.S. LEXIS 4651
Docket number
01-488
Decided
June 24, 2002
Argued
April 22, 2002
Decision type
Opinion of the Court (orally argued)
Disposition
Reversed and remanded
Outcome for petitioner
The petitioning party received a favorable disposition
Vote
7–2
Majority opinion
Ruth Bader Ginsburg
Opinion assigned by
John Paul Stevens
How the case arrived
Certiorari
Legal provision
Sixth Amendment (right to trial by jury)
Type of law
Constitutional amendment
Altered precedent
Yes — formally altered the Court's precedent
Held unconstitutional
A state or territorial law, regulation or constitutional provision
Decision direction (SCDB)
Liberal what this means

How the Justices voted

JusticeVoteSeparate writing
Chief Justice William H. RehnquistDissent
Justice John Paul StevensMajority
Justice Sandra Day O'ConnorDissentWrote an opinion
Justice Antonin ScaliaConcurrenceWrote an opinion
Justice Anthony M. KennedyConcurrenceWrote an opinion
Justice David H. SouterMajority
Justice Clarence ThomasConcurrence
Justice Ruth Bader GinsburgMajorityWrote an opinion
Justice Stephen G. BreyerSpecial concurrenceWrote an opinion

Full case caption

Timothy Stuart Ring v. Arizona

SCDB identifiers: case 2001-077, docket 2001-077-01.

Other cases on “Statutory construction of criminal laws, sentencing guidelines”

See all

Cases on the same legal provision: Sixth Amendment (right to trial by jury)

Same Term, same area (Criminal Procedure)

See all

Source: Supreme Court Database, 2026 Release 01 (data file dated September 8, 2026). Imported into CaseTrail November 5, 2026. Coverage: decisions from the 1946 through 2025 Terms. Methodology · Report an error