Timothy Stuart Ring v. Arizona
536 U.S. 584 · Decided June 24, 2002 · Supreme Court of the United States
At a glance
Timothy Stuart Ring v. Arizona was decided on June 24, 2002 by a vote of 7–2. The Court reversed the lower court's decision and remanded the case. Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg wrote the opinion of the Court. SCDB classifies its main issue as “Statutory construction of criminal laws, sentencing guidelines” in the Criminal Procedure area. SCDB codes this decision as formally altering one or more of the Court's own precedents. SCDB records that the Court declared a state or territorial law, regulation or constitutional provision unconstitutional.
Read the opinion
Case details
- Citations
- 536 U.S. 584 · 122 S. Ct. 2428 · 153 L. Ed. 2d 556 · 2002 U.S. LEXIS 4651
- Docket number
- 01-488
- Decided
- June 24, 2002
- Argued
- April 22, 2002
- Court era
- Rehnquist Court
- Decision type
- Opinion of the Court (orally argued)
- Disposition
- Reversed and remanded
- Outcome for petitioner
- The petitioning party received a favorable disposition
- Vote
- 7–2
- Majority opinion
- Ruth Bader Ginsburg
- Opinion assigned by
- John Paul Stevens
- How the case arrived
- Certiorari
- Issue area
- Criminal Procedure
- Legal provision
- Sixth Amendment (right to trial by jury)
- Type of law
- Constitutional amendment
- Altered precedent
- Yes — formally altered the Court's precedent
- Held unconstitutional
- A state or territorial law, regulation or constitutional provision
- Decision direction (SCDB)
- Liberal what this means
How the Justices voted
| Justice | Vote | Separate writing |
|---|---|---|
| Chief Justice William H. Rehnquist | Dissent | |
| Justice John Paul Stevens | Majority | |
| Justice Sandra Day O'Connor | Dissent | Wrote an opinion |
| Justice Antonin Scalia | Concurrence | Wrote an opinion |
| Justice Anthony M. Kennedy | Concurrence | Wrote an opinion |
| Justice David H. Souter | Majority | |
| Justice Clarence Thomas | Concurrence | |
| Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg | Majority | Wrote an opinion |
| Justice Stephen G. Breyer | Special concurrence | Wrote an opinion |
Full case caption
Timothy Stuart Ring v. Arizona
SCDB identifiers: case 2001-077, docket 2001-077-01.
Related decisions
Other cases on “Statutory construction of criminal laws, sentencing guidelines”
- Paula L. Buford v. United States
- Christopher A. Lopez v. Randy J. Davis
- Charles C. Apprendi, Jr. v. New JerseyLaw held unconstitutional
- Ralph Howard Blakely, Jr. v. WashingtonLaw held unconstitutional
- Cornell Johnson v. United States
- United States v. Freddie J. BookerLaw held unconstitutional
Cases on the same legal provision: Sixth Amendment (right to trial by jury)
- Ray A. Lewis v. United States
- Oregon v. Thomas Eugene Ice
- United States v. Jerry J. Nachtigal
- David Riggins v. Nevada
- Dawud Majid Mu'min v. Virginia
- Blanton v. City of North Las Vegas
Same Term, same area (Criminal Procedure)
- United States v. Mark James Knights
- William Arthur Kelly v. South Carolina
- United States v. Ralph Arvizu
- United States v. Alphonso Vonn
- Walter Mickens, Jr. v. John Taylor
- United States v. Leonard CottonAltered precedent
Source: Supreme Court Database, 2026 Release 01 (data file dated September 8, 2026). Imported into CaseTrail November 5, 2026. Coverage: decisions from the 1946 through 2025 Terms. Methodology · Report an error