CaseTrail

In re R. M. J.

455 U.S. 191 · Decided January 25, 1982 · Supreme Court of the United States

Record summary. This page is generated from the Supreme Court Database’s coded data about the case. It describes who decided what, not the Court’s reasoning. Read the opinion itself before relying on it. Not legal advice.

At a glance

In re R. M. J. was decided on January 25, 1982 unanimously (9–0). The Court reversed the lower court's decision. Justice Lewis F. Powell Jr. wrote the opinion of the Court. SCDB classifies its main issue as “Commercial speech, attorneys” in the Attorneys area. SCDB records that the Court declared a state or territorial law, regulation or constitutional provision unconstitutional.

Read the opinion

Case details

Citations
455 U.S. 191 · 102 S. Ct. 929 · 71 L. Ed. 2d 64 · 1982 U.S. LEXIS 68
Docket number
80-1431
Decided
January 25, 1982
Argued
November 9, 1981
Court era
Burger Court
Decision type
Opinion of the Court (orally argued)
Disposition
Reversed
Outcome for petitioner
The petitioning party received a favorable disposition
Vote
9–0 (unanimous)
Majority opinion
Lewis F. Powell Jr.
Opinion assigned by
Warren E. Burger
How the case arrived
Appeal
Issue area
Attorneys
Legal provision
First Amendment (speech, press, and assembly)
Type of law
Constitutional amendment
Held unconstitutional
A state or territorial law, regulation or constitutional provision
Decision direction (SCDB)
Liberal what this means

How the Justices voted

Full case caption

In re R. M. J.

SCDB identifiers: case 1981-037, docket 1981-037-01.

Other cases on “Commercial speech, attorneys”

See all

Cases on the same legal provision: First Amendment (speech, press, and assembly)

Same Term, same area (Attorneys)

See all

Source: Supreme Court Database, 2026 Release 01 (data file dated September 8, 2026). Imported into CaseTrail November 5, 2026. Coverage: decisions from the 1946 through 2025 Terms. Methodology · Report an error