In re R. M. J.
455 U.S. 191 · Decided January 25, 1982 · Supreme Court of the United States
Record summary. This page is generated from the Supreme Court Database’s coded data about the case. It describes who decided what, not the Court’s reasoning. Read the opinion itself before relying on it. Not legal advice.
At a glance
In re R. M. J. was decided on January 25, 1982 unanimously (9–0). The Court reversed the lower court's decision. Justice Lewis F. Powell Jr. wrote the opinion of the Court. SCDB classifies its main issue as “Commercial speech, attorneys” in the Attorneys area. SCDB records that the Court declared a state or territorial law, regulation or constitutional provision unconstitutional.
Read the opinion
Case details
- Citations
- 455 U.S. 191 · 102 S. Ct. 929 · 71 L. Ed. 2d 64 · 1982 U.S. LEXIS 68
- Docket number
- 80-1431
- Decided
- January 25, 1982
- Argued
- November 9, 1981
- Court era
- Burger Court
- Decision type
- Opinion of the Court (orally argued)
- Disposition
- Reversed
- Outcome for petitioner
- The petitioning party received a favorable disposition
- Vote
- 9–0 (unanimous)
- Majority opinion
- Lewis F. Powell Jr.
- Opinion assigned by
- Warren E. Burger
- How the case arrived
- Appeal
- Issue (SCDB)
- Commercial speech, attorneys
- Issue area
- Attorneys
- Legal provision
- First Amendment (speech, press, and assembly)
- Type of law
- Constitutional amendment
- Held unconstitutional
- A state or territorial law, regulation or constitutional provision
- Decision direction (SCDB)
- Liberal what this means
How the Justices voted
| Justice | Vote | Separate writing |
|---|---|---|
| Justice William J. Brennan Jr. | Majority | |
| Justice Byron R. White | Majority | |
| Justice Thurgood Marshall | Majority | |
| Chief Justice Warren E. Burger | Majority | |
| Justice Harry A. Blackmun | Majority | |
| Justice Lewis F. Powell Jr. | Majority | Wrote an opinion |
| Justice William H. Rehnquist | Majority | |
| Justice John Paul Stevens | Majority | |
| Justice Sandra Day O'Connor | Majority |
Full case caption
In re R. M. J.
SCDB identifiers: case 1981-037, docket 1981-037-01.
Related decisions
Other cases on “Commercial speech, attorneys”
- Zauderer v. Office of Disciplinary Counsel of the Supreme Court of OhioLaw held unconstitutional
- In re Primus
- Ohralik v. Ohio State Bar Assn.
- Bates v. State Bar of ArizonaLaw held unconstitutional
- Shapero v. Kentucky Bar AssociationLaw held unconstitutional
- Gary E. Peel v. Attorney Registration and Disciplinary Commission of IllinoisLaw held unconstitutional
Cases on the same legal provision: First Amendment (speech, press, and assembly)
- Village of Hoffman Estates v. the Flipside
- California ex Rel. Cooper v. Mitchell Brothers' Santa Ana Theater
- Brown v. HartlageLaw held unconstitutional
- Globe Newspaper Co. v. Superior Court for the County of NorfolkLaw held unconstitutional
- Board of Education v. Pico
- Clements v. Fashing
Same Term, same area (Attorneys)
Source: Supreme Court Database, 2026 Release 01 (data file dated September 8, 2026). Imported into CaseTrail November 5, 2026. Coverage: decisions from the 1946 through 2025 Terms. Methodology · Report an error