CaseTrail

Zauderer v. Office of Disciplinary Counsel of the Supreme Court of Ohio

471 U.S. 626 · Decided May 28, 1985 · Supreme Court of the United States

Record summary. This page is generated from the Supreme Court Database’s coded data about the case. It describes who decided what, not the Court’s reasoning. Read the opinion itself before relying on it. Not legal advice.

At a glance

Zauderer v. Office of Disciplinary Counsel of the Supreme Court of Ohio was decided on May 28, 1985 by a vote of 5–3. The Court affirmed the lower court's decision in part and reversed or vacated it in part. Justice Byron R. White wrote the opinion of the Court. SCDB classifies its main issue as “Commercial speech, attorneys” in the Attorneys area. SCDB records that the Court declared a state or territorial law, regulation or constitutional provision unconstitutional.

Read the opinion

Case details

Citations
471 U.S. 626 · 105 S. Ct. 2265 · 85 L. Ed. 2d 652 · 1985 U.S. LEXIS 19
Docket number
83-2166
Decided
May 28, 1985
Argued
January 7, 1985
Court era
Burger Court
Decision type
Opinion of the Court (orally argued)
Disposition
Affirmed and reversed (or vacated) in part
Outcome for petitioner
The petitioning party received a favorable disposition
Vote
5–3
Majority opinion
Byron R. White
Opinion assigned by
William J. Brennan Jr.
How the case arrived
Appeal
Issue area
Attorneys
Legal provision
First Amendment (speech, press, and assembly)
Type of law
Constitutional amendment
Held unconstitutional
A state or territorial law, regulation or constitutional provision
Decision direction (SCDB)
Liberal what this means

How the Justices voted

JusticeVoteSeparate writing
Justice William J. Brennan Jr.ConcurrenceWrote an opinion
Justice Byron R. WhiteMajorityWrote an opinion
Justice Thurgood MarshallConcurrence
Chief Justice Warren E. BurgerDissent
Justice Harry A. BlackmunMajority
Justice William H. RehnquistDissent
Justice John Paul StevensMajority
Justice Sandra Day O'ConnorDissentWrote an opinion

Did not participate: Lewis F. Powell Jr..

Full case caption

Zauderer v. Office of Disciplinary Counsel of the Supreme Court of Ohio

SCDB identifiers: case 1984-102, docket 1984-102-01.

Other cases on “Commercial speech, attorneys”

See all

Cases on the same legal provision: First Amendment (speech, press, and assembly)

Same Term, same area (Attorneys)

See all

Source: Supreme Court Database, 2026 Release 01 (data file dated September 8, 2026). Imported into CaseTrail November 5, 2026. Coverage: decisions from the 1946 through 2025 Terms. Methodology · Report an error