James B. Hunt, Jr. v. Martin Cromartie
526 U.S. 541 · Decided May 17, 1999 · Supreme Court of the United States
Record summary. This page is generated from the Supreme Court Database’s coded data about the case. It describes who decided what, not the Court’s reasoning. Read the opinion itself before relying on it. Not legal advice.
At a glance
James B. Hunt, Jr. v. Martin Cromartie was decided on May 17, 1999 unanimously (9–0). The Court reversed the lower court's decision. Justice Clarence Thomas wrote the opinion of the Court. SCDB classifies its main issue as “Reapportionment (other than Voting Rights Act plans)” in the Civil Rights area.
Read the opinion
Case details
- Citations
- 526 U.S. 541 · 119 S. Ct. 1545 · 143 L. Ed. 2d 731 · 1999 U.S. LEXIS 3171
- Docket number
- 98-85
- Decided
- May 17, 1999
- Argued
- January 20, 1999
- Court era
- Rehnquist Court
- Decision type
- Opinion of the Court (orally argued)
- Disposition
- Reversed
- Outcome for petitioner
- The petitioning party received a favorable disposition
- Vote
- 9–0 (unanimous)
- Majority opinion
- Clarence Thomas
- Opinion assigned by
- William H. Rehnquist
- How the case arrived
- Appeal
- Issue area
- Civil Rights
- Legal provision
- Fourteenth Amendment (equal protection)
- Type of law
- Constitutional amendment
- Decision direction (SCDB)
- Liberal what this means
How the Justices voted
| Justice | Vote | Separate writing |
|---|---|---|
| Chief Justice William H. Rehnquist | Majority | |
| Justice John Paul Stevens | Special concurrence | Wrote an opinion |
| Justice Sandra Day O'Connor | Majority | |
| Justice Antonin Scalia | Majority | |
| Justice Anthony M. Kennedy | Majority | |
| Justice David H. Souter | Special concurrence | |
| Justice Clarence Thomas | Majority | Wrote an opinion |
| Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg | Special concurrence | |
| Justice Stephen G. Breyer | Special concurrence |
Full case caption
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor of North Carolina, et al. v. Martin Cromartie et al.
SCDB identifiers: case 1998-054, docket 1998-054-01.
Related decisions
Other cases on “Reapportionment (other than Voting Rights Act plans)”
- C. Martin Lawyer v. Department of Justice
- Michael F. Easley v. Martin Cromartie
- Ruth O. Shaw v. James B. Hunt, Jr.Law held unconstitutional
- George W. Bush v. Al VeraLaw held unconstitutional
- Utah v. Donald L. Evans
- Wisconsin v. City of New York
Cases on the same legal provision: Fourteenth Amendment (equal protection)
- Central State University v. American Association of University Professors
- Village of Willowbrook v. Grace Olech
- Dennis C. Vacco v. Timothy E. Quill
- M. L. B. v. S. L. J.Law held unconstitutional
- United States v. VirginiaLaw held unconstitutional
- Roy Romer v. Richard G. EvansLaw held unconstitutional
Same Term, same area (Civil Rights)
- Michael A. Haddle v. Jeanette G. Garrison
- In re Michael Kennedy
- Vicky M. Lopez v. Monterey County
- National Collegiate Athletic Association v. R. M. Smith
- Janet Reno v. American-Arab Anti-Discrimination Committee
- Cedar Rapids Community School District v. Garret F.
Source: Supreme Court Database, 2026 Release 01 (data file dated September 8, 2026). Imported into CaseTrail November 5, 2026. Coverage: decisions from the 1946 through 2025 Terms. Methodology · Report an error