Michael F. Easley v. Martin Cromartie
532 U.S. 234 · Decided April 18, 2001 · Supreme Court of the United States
Record summary. This page is generated from the Supreme Court Database’s coded data about the case. It describes who decided what, not the Court’s reasoning. Read the opinion itself before relying on it. Not legal advice.
At a glance
Michael F. Easley v. Martin Cromartie was decided on April 18, 2001 by a vote of 5–4. The Court reversed the lower court's decision. Justice Stephen G. Breyer wrote the opinion of the Court. SCDB classifies its main issue as “Reapportionment (other than Voting Rights Act plans)” in the Civil Rights area.
Read the opinion
Case details
- Citations
- 532 U.S. 234 · 121 S. Ct. 1452 · 149 L. Ed. 2d 430 · 2001 U.S. LEXIS 3206
- Docket number
- 99-1864
- Decided
- April 18, 2001
- Argued
- November 27, 2000
- Court era
- Rehnquist Court
- Decision type
- Opinion of the Court (orally argued)
- Disposition
- Reversed
- Outcome for petitioner
- The petitioning party received a favorable disposition
- Vote
- 5–4
- Majority opinion
- Stephen G. Breyer
- Opinion assigned by
- John Paul Stevens
- How the case arrived
- Appeal
- Issue area
- Civil Rights
- Legal provision
- Fourteenth Amendment (equal protection)
- Type of law
- Constitutional amendment
- Decision direction (SCDB)
- Liberal what this means
How the Justices voted
| Justice | Vote | Separate writing |
|---|---|---|
| Chief Justice William H. Rehnquist | Dissent | |
| Justice John Paul Stevens | Majority | |
| Justice Sandra Day O'Connor | Majority | |
| Justice Antonin Scalia | Dissent | |
| Justice Anthony M. Kennedy | Dissent | |
| Justice David H. Souter | Majority | |
| Justice Clarence Thomas | Dissent | Wrote an opinion |
| Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg | Majority | |
| Justice Stephen G. Breyer | Majority | Wrote an opinion |
Full case caption
Michael F. Easley, * Governor of North Carolina, et al. v. Martin Cromartie, et al.
SCDB identifiers: case 2000-041, docket 2000-041-01.
Related decisions
Other cases on “Reapportionment (other than Voting Rights Act plans)”
- Utah v. Donald L. Evans
- James B. Hunt, Jr. v. Martin Cromartie
- C. Martin Lawyer v. Department of Justice
- Ruth O. Shaw v. James B. Hunt, Jr.Law held unconstitutional
- George W. Bush v. Al VeraLaw held unconstitutional
- Wisconsin v. City of New York
Cases on the same legal provision: Fourteenth Amendment (equal protection)
- Village of Willowbrook v. Grace Olech
- Central State University v. American Association of University Professors
- Michael Fitzgerald v. Racing Association of Central Iowa
- Jennifer Gratz and Patrick Hamacher v. Lee Bollinger
- Barbara Grutter v. Lee Bollinger
- Dennis C. Vacco v. Timothy E. Quill
Same Term, same area (Civil Rights)
- State of Arizona v. State of California
- George W. Bush and Richard Cheney v. Albert Gore, Jr.
- Rebecca McDowell Cook v. Donald J. Gralike and Mike HarmanLaw held unconstitutional
- Clark County School District v. Shirley A. Breeden
- C & L Enterprises, Inc. v. Citizen Band Potawatomi Indian Tribe of Oklahoma
- Atkinson Trading Company, Inc. v. Joe Shirley, Jr.
Source: Supreme Court Database, 2026 Release 01 (data file dated September 8, 2026). Imported into CaseTrail November 5, 2026. Coverage: decisions from the 1946 through 2025 Terms. Methodology · Report an error