CaseTrail

Michael F. Easley v. Martin Cromartie

532 U.S. 234 · Decided April 18, 2001 · Supreme Court of the United States

Record summary. This page is generated from the Supreme Court Database’s coded data about the case. It describes who decided what, not the Court’s reasoning. Read the opinion itself before relying on it. Not legal advice.

At a glance

Michael F. Easley v. Martin Cromartie was decided on April 18, 2001 by a vote of 5–4. The Court reversed the lower court's decision. Justice Stephen G. Breyer wrote the opinion of the Court. SCDB classifies its main issue as “Reapportionment (other than Voting Rights Act plans)” in the Civil Rights area.

Read the opinion

Case details

Citations
532 U.S. 234 · 121 S. Ct. 1452 · 149 L. Ed. 2d 430 · 2001 U.S. LEXIS 3206
Docket number
99-1864
Decided
April 18, 2001
Argued
November 27, 2000
Decision type
Opinion of the Court (orally argued)
Disposition
Reversed
Outcome for petitioner
The petitioning party received a favorable disposition
Vote
5–4
Majority opinion
Stephen G. Breyer
Opinion assigned by
John Paul Stevens
How the case arrived
Appeal
Issue area
Civil Rights
Legal provision
Fourteenth Amendment (equal protection)
Type of law
Constitutional amendment
Decision direction (SCDB)
Liberal what this means

How the Justices voted

Full case caption

Michael F. Easley, * Governor of North Carolina, et al. v. Martin Cromartie, et al.

SCDB identifiers: case 2000-041, docket 2000-041-01.

Other cases on “Reapportionment (other than Voting Rights Act plans)”

See all

Cases on the same legal provision: Fourteenth Amendment (equal protection)

Same Term, same area (Civil Rights)

See all

Source: Supreme Court Database, 2026 Release 01 (data file dated September 8, 2026). Imported into CaseTrail November 5, 2026. Coverage: decisions from the 1946 through 2025 Terms. Methodology · Report an error