Japan Line, Ltd. v. County of Los Angeles
441 U.S. 434 · Decided April 30, 1979 · Supreme Court of the United States
At a glance
Japan Line, Ltd. v. County of Los Angeles was decided on April 30, 1979 by a vote of 8–1. The Court reversed the lower court's decision. Justice Harry A. Blackmun wrote the opinion of the Court. SCDB classifies its main issue as “State or local government tax” in the Economic Activity area. SCDB records that the Court declared a state or territorial law, regulation or constitutional provision unconstitutional.
Read the opinion
Case details
- Citations
- 441 U.S. 434 · 99 S. Ct. 1813 · 60 L. Ed. 2d 336 · 1979 U.S. LEXIS 20
- Docket number
- 77-1378
- Decided
- April 30, 1979
- Argued
- January 8, 1979
- Court era
- Burger Court
- Decision type
- Opinion of the Court (orally argued)
- Disposition
- Reversed
- Outcome for petitioner
- The petitioning party received a favorable disposition
- Vote
- 8–1
- Majority opinion
- Harry A. Blackmun
- Opinion assigned by
- Warren E. Burger
- How the case arrived
- Appeal
- Issue (SCDB)
- State or local government tax
- Issue area
- Economic Activity
- Legal provision
- Article I, Section 8, Paragraph 3 (interstate commerce clause)
- Type of law
- Constitution
- Held unconstitutional
- A state or territorial law, regulation or constitutional provision
- Decision direction (SCDB)
- Conservative what this means
How the Justices voted
| Justice | Vote | Separate writing |
|---|---|---|
| Justice William J. Brennan Jr. | Majority | |
| Justice Potter Stewart | Majority | |
| Justice Byron R. White | Majority | |
| Justice Thurgood Marshall | Majority | |
| Chief Justice Warren E. Burger | Majority | |
| Justice Harry A. Blackmun | Majority | Wrote an opinion |
| Justice Lewis F. Powell Jr. | Majority | |
| Justice William H. Rehnquist | Dissent | Wrote an opinion |
| Justice John Paul Stevens | Majority |
Full case caption
Japan Line, Ltd., et al. v. County of Los Angeles et al.
SCDB identifiers: case 1978-085, docket 1978-085-01.
Related decisions
Other cases on “State or local government tax”
- Arizona Public Service Co. v. SneadLaw held unconstitutional
- Chase Manhattan Bank, N. A. v. Finance Administration of City of New York
- Montana v. United States
- First Federal Savings & Loan Association of Boston v. Tax Commission of Massachusetts
- Moorman Manufacturing Co. v. Bair
- Mobil Oil Corp. v. Commissioner of Taxes of Vermont
Cases on the same legal provision: Article I, Section 8, Paragraph 3 (interstate commerce clause)
- Hughes v. OklahomaAltered precedentLaw held unconstitutional
- City of Philadelphia v. New JerseyLaw held unconstitutional
- Lewis v. Bt Investment Managers, Inc.Law held unconstitutional
- Reeves, Inc. v. Stake
- Raymond Motor Transportation, Inc. v. RiceLaw held unconstitutional
- Hunt v. Washington State Apple Advertising CommissionLaw held unconstitutional
Same Term, same area (Economic Activity)
- Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System v. First Lincolnwood Corp.
- Marquette National Bank of Minneapolis v. First of Omaha Service Corp.
- Federal Energy Regulatory Commission v. Pennzoil Producing Co.
- International Brotherhood of Teamsters v. Daniel
- Director v. Rasmussen
- Butner v. United States
Source: Supreme Court Database, 2026 Release 01 (data file dated September 8, 2026). Imported into CaseTrail November 5, 2026. Coverage: decisions from the 1946 through 2025 Terms. Methodology · Report an error