Reeves, Inc. v. Stake
447 U.S. 429 · Decided June 19, 1980 · Supreme Court of the United States
Record summary. This page is generated from the Supreme Court Database’s coded data about the case. It describes who decided what, not the Court’s reasoning. Read the opinion itself before relying on it. Not legal advice.
At a glance
Reeves, Inc. v. Stake was decided on June 19, 1980 by a vote of 5–4. The Court affirmed the lower court's decision. Justice Harry A. Blackmun wrote the opinion of the Court. SCDB classifies its main issue as “State or local business regulation” in the Economic Activity area.
Read the opinion
Case details
- Citations
- 447 U.S. 429 · 100 S. Ct. 2271 · 65 L. Ed. 2d 244 · 1980 U.S. LEXIS 40
- Docket number
- 79-677
- Decided
- June 19, 1980
- Argued
- April 16, 1980
- Court era
- Burger Court
- Decision type
- Opinion of the Court (orally argued)
- Disposition
- Affirmed
- Outcome for petitioner
- The petitioning party did not receive a favorable disposition
- Vote
- 5–4
- Majority opinion
- Harry A. Blackmun
- Opinion assigned by
- Warren E. Burger
- How the case arrived
- Certiorari
- Issue (SCDB)
- State or local business regulation
- Issue area
- Economic Activity
- Legal provision
- Article I, Section 8, Paragraph 3 (interstate commerce clause)
- Type of law
- Constitution
- Decision direction (SCDB)
- Conservative what this means
How the Justices voted
| Justice | Vote | Separate writing |
|---|---|---|
| Justice William J. Brennan Jr. | Dissent | |
| Justice Potter Stewart | Majority | |
| Justice Byron R. White | Dissent | |
| Justice Thurgood Marshall | Majority | |
| Chief Justice Warren E. Burger | Majority | |
| Justice Harry A. Blackmun | Majority | Wrote an opinion |
| Justice Lewis F. Powell Jr. | Dissent | Wrote an opinion |
| Justice William H. Rehnquist | Majority | |
| Justice John Paul Stevens | Dissent |
Full case caption
Reeves, Inc. v. Stake et al.
SCDB identifiers: case 1979-123, docket 1979-123-01.
Related decisions
Other cases on “State or local business regulation”
- Lewis v. Bt Investment Managers, Inc.Law held unconstitutional
- Minnesota v. Clover Leaf Creamery Co.
- Kassel v. Consolidated Freightways Corporation of DelawareLaw held unconstitutional
- Marquette National Bank of Minneapolis v. First of Omaha Service Corp.
- New England Power Co. v. New HampshireLaw held unconstitutional
- G.D. Searle & Co. v. Cohn
Cases on the same legal provision: Article I, Section 8, Paragraph 3 (interstate commerce clause)
- Western & Southern Life Insurance Co. v. State Board of Equalization of California
- Maryland v. LouisianaLaw held unconstitutional
- Commonwealth Edison Co. v. MontanaAltered precedent
- Japan Line, Ltd. v. County of Los AngelesLaw held unconstitutional
- Hughes v. OklahomaAltered precedentLaw held unconstitutional
- Merrion v. Jicarilla Apache Tribe
Same Term, same area (Economic Activity)
- Transamerica Mortgage Advisors, Inc. v. Lewis
- P. C. Pfeiffer Co., Inc. v. Ford
- United States v. Kubrick
- Ferri v. Ackerman
- McLain v. Real Estate Board of New Orleans, Inc.
- Hatzlachh Supply Co., Inc. v. United States
Source: Supreme Court Database, 2026 Release 01 (data file dated September 8, 2026). Imported into CaseTrail November 5, 2026. Coverage: decisions from the 1946 through 2025 Terms. Methodology · Report an error