Western & Southern Life Insurance Co. v. State Board of Equalization of California
451 U.S. 648 · Decided May 26, 1981 · Supreme Court of the United States
At a glance
Western & Southern Life Insurance Co. v. State Board of Equalization of California was decided on May 26, 1981 by a vote of 7–2. The Court affirmed the lower court's decision. Justice William J. Brennan Jr. wrote the opinion of the Court. SCDB classifies its main issue as “State or local government tax” in the Economic Activity area.
Read the opinion
Case details
- Citations
- 451 U.S. 648 · 101 S. Ct. 2070 · 68 L. Ed. 2d 514 · 1981 U.S. LEXIS 102
- Docket number
- 79-1423
- Decided
- May 26, 1981
- Argued
- January 12, 1981
- Court era
- Burger Court
- Decision type
- Opinion of the Court (orally argued)
- Disposition
- Affirmed
- Outcome for petitioner
- The petitioning party did not receive a favorable disposition
- Vote
- 7–2
- Majority opinion
- William J. Brennan Jr.
- Opinion assigned by
- Warren E. Burger
- How the case arrived
- Appeal
- Issue (SCDB)
- State or local government tax
- Issue area
- Economic Activity
- Legal provision
- Article I, Section 8, Paragraph 3 (interstate commerce clause)
- Type of law
- Constitution
- Decision direction (SCDB)
- Liberal what this means
How the Justices voted
| Justice | Vote | Separate writing |
|---|---|---|
| Justice William J. Brennan Jr. | Majority | Wrote an opinion |
| Justice Potter Stewart | Majority | |
| Justice Byron R. White | Majority | |
| Justice Thurgood Marshall | Majority | |
| Chief Justice Warren E. Burger | Majority | |
| Justice Harry A. Blackmun | Dissent | |
| Justice Lewis F. Powell Jr. | Majority | |
| Justice William H. Rehnquist | Majority | |
| Justice John Paul Stevens | Dissent | Wrote an opinion |
Full case caption
Western & Southern Life Insurance Co. v. State Board of Equalization of California
SCDB identifiers: case 1980-096, docket 1980-096-01.
Related decisions
Other cases on “State or local government tax”
- Maryland v. LouisianaLaw held unconstitutional
- Commonwealth Edison Co. v. MontanaAltered precedent
- United States v. New Mexico
- Exxon Corp. v. Department of Revenue of Wisconsin
- Asarco Inc. v. Idaho State Tax CommissionLaw held unconstitutional
- F. W. Woolworth Co. v. Taxation and Revenue Department of New MexicoLaw held unconstitutional
Cases on the same legal provision: Article I, Section 8, Paragraph 3 (interstate commerce clause)
- Kassel v. Consolidated Freightways Corporation of DelawareLaw held unconstitutional
- Merrion v. Jicarilla Apache Tribe
- New England Power Co. v. New HampshireLaw held unconstitutional
- Reeves, Inc. v. Stake
- Lewis v. Bt Investment Managers, Inc.Law held unconstitutional
- Edgar v. Mite Corp.Law held unconstitutional
Same Term, same area (Economic Activity)
- Environmental Protection Agency v. National Crushed Stone Association
- Potomac Electric Power Co. v. Director
- Minnesota v. Clover Leaf Creamery Co.
- Board of Governors of Federal Reserve System v. Investment Company Institute
- Steadman v. Securities and Exchange Commission
- Diamond v. Diehr
Source: Supreme Court Database, 2026 Release 01 (data file dated September 8, 2026). Imported into CaseTrail November 5, 2026. Coverage: decisions from the 1946 through 2025 Terms. Methodology · Report an error