CaseTrail

Jeffrey Woods v. Timothy Etherton

578 U.S. 113 · Decided April 4, 2016 · Supreme Court of the United States

Record summary. This page is generated from the Supreme Court Database’s coded data about the case. It describes who decided what, not the Court’s reasoning. Read the opinion itself before relying on it. Not legal advice.

At a glance

Jeffrey Woods v. Timothy Etherton was decided on April 4, 2016 unanimously (8–0). The Court reversed the lower court's decision. The decision was issued per curiam (an unsigned opinion of the Court). SCDB classifies its main issue as “Right to counsel” in the Criminal Procedure area.

Read the opinion

Case details

Citations
578 U.S. 113 · 136 S. Ct. 1149 · 194 L. Ed. 2d 333 · 2016 U.S. LEXIS 2277
Docket number
15-723
Decided
April 4, 2016
Court era
Roberts Court
Decision type
Per curiam (no oral argument)
Disposition
Reversed
Outcome for petitioner
The petitioning party received a favorable disposition
Vote
8–0 (unanimous)
Opinion assigned by
John G. Roberts Jr.
How the case arrived
Certiorari
Issue (SCDB)
Right to counsel
Legal provision
antiterrorism and effective death penalty
Type of law
Infrequently litigated statute
Decision direction (SCDB)
Conservative what this means

How the Justices voted

Full case caption

Jeffrey Woods, Warden, Petitioner v. Timothy Etherton

SCDB identifiers: case 2015-074, docket 2015-074-01.

Other cases on “Right to counsel”

See all

Cases on the same legal provision: antiterrorism and effective death penalty

Same Term, same area (Criminal Procedure)

See all

Source: Supreme Court Database, 2026 Release 01 (data file dated September 8, 2026). Imported into CaseTrail November 5, 2026. Coverage: decisions from the 1946 through 2025 Terms. Methodology · Report an error