CaseTrail

Linda Lingle v. Chevron U.S.A. Inc.

544 U.S. 528 · Decided May 23, 2005 · Supreme Court of the United States

Record summary. This page is generated from the Supreme Court Database’s coded data about the case. It describes who decided what, not the Court’s reasoning. Read the opinion itself before relying on it. Not legal advice.

At a glance

Linda Lingle v. Chevron U.S.A. Inc. was decided on May 23, 2005 unanimously (9–0). The Court reversed the lower court's decision and remanded the case. Justice Sandra Day O'Connor wrote the opinion of the Court. SCDB classifies its main issue as “Due process, takings clause” in the Due Process area.

Read the opinion

Case details

Citations
544 U.S. 528 · 125 S. Ct. 2074 · 161 L. Ed. 2d 876 · 2005 U.S. LEXIS 4342
Docket number
04-163
Decided
May 23, 2005
Argued
February 22, 2005
Decision type
Opinion of the Court (orally argued)
Disposition
Reversed and remanded
Outcome for petitioner
The petitioning party received a favorable disposition
Vote
9–0 (unanimous)
Majority opinion
Sandra Day O'Connor
Opinion assigned by
William H. Rehnquist
How the case arrived
Certiorari
Issue area
Due Process
Legal provision
Fifth Amendment (takings clause)
Type of law
Constitutional amendment
Decision direction (SCDB)
Liberal what this means

How the Justices voted

Full case caption

Linda Lingle, Governor of Hawaii, et al. v. Chevron U.S.A. Inc.

SCDB identifiers: case 2004-046, docket 2004-046-01.

Other cases on “Due process, takings clause”

See all

Cases on the same legal provision: Fifth Amendment (takings clause)

Same Term, same area (Due Process)

See all

Source: Supreme Court Database, 2026 Release 01 (data file dated September 8, 2026). Imported into CaseTrail November 5, 2026. Coverage: decisions from the 1946 through 2025 Terms. Methodology · Report an error