Moe v. Confederated Salish and Kootenai Tribes of the Flathead Reservation
425 U.S. 463 · Decided April 27, 1976 · Supreme Court of the United States
At a glance
Moe v. Confederated Salish and Kootenai Tribes of the Flathead Reservation was decided on April 27, 1976 unanimously (9–0). The Court affirmed the lower court's decision. Justice William H. Rehnquist wrote the opinion of the Court. SCDB classifies its main issue as “Indians, state jurisdiction” in the Civil Rights area.
Read the opinion
Case details
- Citations
- 425 U.S. 463 · 96 S. Ct. 1634 · 48 L. Ed. 2d 96 · 1976 U.S. LEXIS 48
- Docket number
- 74-1656
- Decided
- April 27, 1976
- Argued
- January 20, 1976
- Court era
- Burger Court
- Decision type
- Opinion of the Court (orally argued)
- Disposition
- Affirmed
- Outcome for petitioner
- The petitioning party did not receive a favorable disposition
- Vote
- 9–0 (unanimous)
- Majority opinion
- William H. Rehnquist
- Opinion assigned by
- Warren E. Burger
- How the case arrived
- Appeal
- Issue (SCDB)
- Indians, state jurisdiction
- Issue area
- Civil Rights
- Legal provision
- 28 U.S.C. § 1341
- Type of law
- Infrequently litigated statute
- Decision direction (SCDB)
- Liberal what this means
How the Justices voted
| Justice | Vote | Separate writing |
|---|---|---|
| Justice William J. Brennan Jr. | Majority | |
| Justice Potter Stewart | Majority | |
| Justice Byron R. White | Majority | |
| Justice Thurgood Marshall | Majority | |
| Chief Justice Warren E. Burger | Majority | |
| Justice Harry A. Blackmun | Majority | |
| Justice Lewis F. Powell Jr. | Majority | |
| Justice William H. Rehnquist | Majority | Wrote an opinion |
| Justice John Paul Stevens | Majority |
Full case caption
Moe, Sheriff, et al. v. Confederated Salish and Kootenai Tribes of the Flathead Reservation et al.
SCDB identifiers: case 1975-084, docket 1975-084-01.
Related decisions
Other cases on “Indians, state jurisdiction”
- Bryan v. Itasca CountyLaw held unconstitutional
- Fisher v. District Court of the Sixteenth Judicial District of Montana
- Decoteau v. District County Court for the Tenth Judicial District
- Puyallup Tribe, Inc. v. Department of Game of Washington
- Antoine et Ux. v. Washington
- United States v. John
Cases on the same legal provision: 28 U.S.C. § 1341
- Tully v. Griffin, Inc.
- Rosewell v. Lasalle National Bank
- California v. Grace Brethren Church
- Arkansas v. Farm Credit Services of Central Arkansas
- Georgia Railroad & Banking Co. v. Redwine
- J. Elliott Hibbs v. Kathleen M. Winn
Same Term, same area (Civil Rights)
- Turner v. Department of Employment Security of UtahLaw held unconstitutional
- Mathews v. Eldridge
- De Canas v. Bica
- Fisher v. District Court of the Sixteenth Judicial District of Montana
- Imbler v. Pachtman
- Lavine v. Milne
Source: Supreme Court Database, 2026 Release 01 (data file dated September 8, 2026). Imported into CaseTrail November 5, 2026. Coverage: decisions from the 1946 through 2025 Terms. Methodology · Report an error