National Labor Relations Board v. Stowe Spinning Co.
336 U.S. 226 · Decided February 28, 1949 · Supreme Court of the United States
Record summary. This page is generated from the Supreme Court Database’s coded data about the case. It describes who decided what, not the Court’s reasoning. Read the opinion itself before relying on it. Not legal advice.
At a glance
National Labor Relations Board v. Stowe Spinning Co. was decided on February 28, 1949 by a vote of 6–3. The Court reversed the lower court's decision and remanded the case. Justice Frank Murphy wrote the opinion of the Court. SCDB classifies its main issue as “Due process, takings clause” in the Due Process area.
Read the opinion
Case details
- Citations
- 336 U.S. 226 · 69 S. Ct. 541 · 93 L. Ed. 2d 638 · 1949 U.S. LEXIS 3012
- Docket number
- 46
- Decided
- February 28, 1949
- Argued
- December 9, 1948
- Court era
- Vinson Court
- Decision type
- Opinion of the Court (orally argued)
- Disposition
- Reversed and remanded
- Outcome for petitioner
- The petitioning party received a favorable disposition
- Vote
- 6–3
- Majority opinion
- Frank Murphy
- Opinion assigned by
- Hugo L. Black
- How the case arrived
- Certiorari
- Issue (SCDB)
- Due process, takings clause
- Issue area
- Due Process
- Legal provision
- Fifth Amendment (takings clause)
- Type of law
- Constitutional amendment
- Decision direction (SCDB)
- Liberal what this means
How the Justices voted
| Justice | Vote | Separate writing |
|---|---|---|
| Justice Hugo L. Black | Majority | |
| Justice Stanley F. Reed | Dissent | Wrote an opinion |
| Justice Felix Frankfurter | Majority | |
| Justice William O. Douglas | Majority | |
| Justice Frank Murphy | Majority | Wrote an opinion |
| Justice Robert H. Jackson | Dissent | Wrote an opinion |
| Justice Wiley B. Rutledge | Majority | |
| Justice Harold H. Burton | Majority | |
| Chief Justice Fred M. Vinson | Dissent |
Full case caption
National Labor Relations Board v. Stowe Spinning Co. et al.
SCDB identifiers: case 1948-042, docket 1948-042-01.
Related decisions
Other cases on “Due process, takings clause”
- United States v. Cors
- Propper v. Clark
- Kimball Laundry Co. v. United States
- McGrath v. Manufacturers Trust Co.
- United States v. John J. Felin & Co., Inc.
- Lichter v. United States
Cases on the same legal provision: Fifth Amendment (takings clause)
- United States v. Alcea Band of Tillamooks
- General Box Co. v. United States
- United States v. Grand River Dam Authority
- United States v. Fuller et Ux.
- City of Pittsburgh v. Alco Parking Corp.
- Gurley v. Rhoden
Same Term, same area (Due Process)
- Williams v. New York
- Federal Communications Commission v. WJR
- United States v. Cors
- Propper v. Clark
- Kimball Laundry Co. v. United States
Source: Supreme Court Database, 2026 Release 01 (data file dated September 8, 2026). Imported into CaseTrail November 5, 2026. Coverage: decisions from the 1946 through 2025 Terms. Methodology · Report an error